Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02277652
NCT02277652UnknownNot Applicable

Comparison of Four Different Endotracheal Intubation Devices Performed by Emergency Medical Professionals: a Manikin Study With 6 Airway Scenarios

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education2 sites in 1 country120 target enrollmentStarted: October 1, 2014Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
120
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Time to intubation

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the four different intubation devices in 6 different scenarios.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • minimum 1 year of work experience in emergency medicine
  • experienced emergency medical personnel (paramedics, nurses, physicians)

Exclusion Criteria

  • not meet the above criteria
  • wrist or low back diseases

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time to intubation

Time Frame: 1 month

time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Cormack-Lehane grading(1 month)
  • Success of intubation(1 month)
  • POGO score(1 month)
  • VAS score(1 month)

Investigators

Sponsor
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Lukasz Szarpak

Lukasz Szarpak

National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials