In-exsufflator Cough Assist Device in Patients With Symptomatic Bronchiectasis

Not Applicable

Terminated

Conditions: Bronchiectasis

Interventions: Device: In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device

Registration Number: NCT00452114

Lead Sponsor: University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Brief Summary: This study is a randomized, controlled trial examining the effectiveness of the mechanical cough-assist device (in-exsufflator) in promoting the clearance of retained airway secretions in patients with symptomatic bronchiectasis. We hypothesize that this enhanced clearance of airway secretions will lead to a decline in the number of acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis experienced by these patients during the study period, improve health-related quality of life, decrease overall health-care costs and improve pulmonary function.

Detailed Description: Bronchiectasis is characterized by airway dilatation with the potential to cause devastating illness, including repeated respiratory infections requiring antibiotics, disabling productive, mucopurulent cough, shortness of breath and occasional hemoptysis. The damaged and dilated airways lead to persisting bacterial infection of the bronchi and bronchioles, causing inflammation and retained secretions, which in turn may further damage the airways. Patients typically suffer from frequent, severe and refractory episodes of bacterial bronchitis, often requiring hospitalization and prolonged courses of antibiotics. The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis involves the retention of viscid, tenacious inflammatory secretions and microbes leading to a "vicious cycle" of airway obstruction, destruction and recurrent infection with further compromise of the mucociliary clearance host defense apparatus. It has been widely proposed and recommended that methods of enhancing clearance of airway secretions should be an integral component of the care of patients with bronchiectasis. Despite these recommendations and a sound pathophysiologic plausibility given the central role retention of secretions plays in the disease, the effectiveness of interventions targeted toward enhancing bronchopulmonary hygiene has not been systematically studied. It is also not known whether the ability to generate an adequate cough would predict which patient will benefit from these interventions.

The mechanical in-exsufflator device assists patients in clearing retained secretions by augmenting the expiratory flow and force of the patient's cough with the addition of a cycle of positive and negative inspiratory pressure. An effective cough mechanism is actually an important and beneficial host defense which aids in mucus clearance along with the mucociliary apparatus. We hypothesize that daily, regular use of the in-exsufflator device will lead to a reduction in acute bronchiectasis exacerbations- a clinically meaningful endpoint- with other possible beneficial outcomes including improved pulmonary function, improved health-related quality of life and decreased health care costs.

Despite the lack of rigorous, well-designed studies supporting the role and most effective mode of bronchial hygiene physiotherapy in patients with bronchiectasis, many Pulmonologists recommend the flutter valve device as the generally accepted "standard of care" at this time due to its relative non-invasiveness, ease of use and high level of patient acceptability. The flutter valve is a simple, hand-held, pipe-like device which helps loosen secretions by providing an expiratory low-pressure vibratory pulse to the patient's airway when used. This study will provide a comparison of the clinical efficacy of these mechanical chest physiotherapy devices in the setting of bronchiectasis.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: TERMINATED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 28

Inclusion Criteria

Chest CT scan confirmation of bronchiectasis
At least two exacerbations in the preceding 12 months requiring antibiotics

Exclusion Criteria

Cystic fibrosis
Bullous emphysema
History of spontaneous pneumothorax
History of massive hemoptysis: greater than 200 cc in a 24 hour period
Lung resection surgery in the past 6 months
Use of the mechanical cough in-exsufflator in the prior 3 months
Inability to speak and read English
Inability to demonstrate proper use of the cough-assist or flutter device
Unable to provide informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Assignment to In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device	In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device	In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device augments the expiratory flow and force of the patient's cough with the addition of a cycle of positive and negative inspiratory pressure when used daily

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Number of Suppurative Exacerbations Per Patient Per Year	12 months	The impact of the intervention is measured by the total number of suppurative exacerbations per patient within a 12 month period.
Number of Hospitalizations and Urgent/Unscheduled Outpatient Visits	12 months	The impact of the intervention is measured by the number of hospitalizations and urgent/unscheduled outpatient visits the participants experienced within a 12 month period.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Quality of Life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire)	12 months	Quality of life is measured using St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, a 50 item disease-specific instrument designed to measure impact on overall health, daily life and perceived well-being in patients with obstructive airways disease. The instrument consists of 2 parts, and 3 components. Part 1 measures symptom frequency and severity with a 1,3 or 12 month recall. Part 1 is evaluated using several scales. Part 2 measures impact of breathlessness on activities including social functioning and psychological disturbances. Part 2 is evaluated by dichotomous (true false) evaluation except the final question which is a 4 point likert scale. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating more limitation and lower quality of life.
Quality of Life (Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire)	12 months	Quality of life is measured using the Cough Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ) to measure the effect of interventions on cough-specific quality of life. The Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire consist of 28 questions about cough and its effects using Likert-like 4-point scales, with lower scores indicating less effect of cough on health related quality of life. CQLQ scale ranges from 28 to 112 with higher scores indicating worse outcome or status.

Trial Locations

Locations (2): UMass Memorial Medical Center, Universty Campus
🇺🇸
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
St. Vincent Medical Center
🇺🇸
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States