Compare the effect of bone graft with collagen membrane to collagen membrane alone in dental extraction socket preservation.

Not yet recruiting

Brief Summary: The aim of the present randomized control clinical trail is to clinically evaluate the hard tissue parameters and histologic assessment of bone quantity and quality in the preserved extraction sockets in both maxilla and mandible.Total number of patients for the study will be 20 requiring atleast 2 teeth for extraction.

objectives-

1.To clinically evaluate and compare the alveolar ridge width and height of extraction sockets preserve with commercially available xenograft and collagen membrane at the time of preservation.

2.To histologically evaluate the bone qualiyty and quantity in the preserved sockets with commercially available xenograft and collagen membrane 6 months after preservation.

3.To clinically compare the alveolar ridge width and height of the preserved extraction sockets with commercially available collagen membrane only.

4.To histologically evaluate the bone quality and quantity in the preserved sockets with commercially available collagen membrane alone 6 months after preservation.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

1.Good oral hygiene â€“ Silness and Loe plaque index (1964) score â‰¤ 1.
2.Subjects requiring extraction of two teeth on contra-lateral site of either maxilla or mandible for caries, endodontic reasons or root fracture, based upon clinical and radiographic evaluations.
3.All extraction sites should have adjacent teeth.
4.Presence of at least 2mm of keratinized tissue to allow easy flap management.
5.Subjects willing to have the extracted tooth to be replaced by an endosseous implant.

Exclusion Criteria

1.History of systemic diseases (i.e., diabetes, autoimmune dysfunction, prolonged cortisone therapy, or chemotherapy) that would contraindicate surgical treatment.
2.Subjects with deleterious oral habits like use of any form of tobacco.
3.Subjects on long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy.
4.Antibiotic prophylaxis within 6 months of study.
5.Subjects having pacemaker.
6.Self-declared pregnancy.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To clinically evaluate the hard tissue parameters and histologic assessment of bone quantity and quality in the preserved extraction sockets in both arches.	6 MONTHS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Histologically evaluate the quality and quantity of bone formed after 6 months of sockets preservation.	6 months

Locations (1): S.C.B.DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
🇮🇳
Cuttack, ORISSA, India
S.C.B.DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
🇮🇳Cuttack, ORISSA, India
DR SHIB SHANKAR PRADHAN
Principal investigator
9861414055
shibshankarscb@gmail.com