Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00870935
NCT00870935CompletedNot Applicable

A Prospective, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and the Tolerability of Three Methods of Performing Hysterosalpingography

IRCCS Burlo Garofolo2 sites in 1 country222 target enrollmentStarted: August 1, 2007Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
222
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
failure rate to complete hysterosalpingography (HSG)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is:

  • to determine whether the choice of the device for performing hysterosalpingography on the basis of the cervix characteristics can reduce the procedure failure rate;
  • to determine whether patient medical history is correlated with the degree of pain experienced during the HSG procedure.

Detailed Description

A group of women will be randomized to undergo HSG, using 1) a balloon catheter in a first group of patients; 2) a cervical vacuum cup in a second group; 3) one of the two devices decided by the operator depending on the cervix characteristics in a third group (that will be named "operator's choice").

The operator will ask the woman to evaluate the degree of pain experienced during the application of the device and the injection of the contrast, after 2, 6 and 24 hours. The degree of pain will be evaluated using the VAS system, an analogue scale rating from 1 to 10.

A nurse will notice the patient's reaction and will evaluate the pain, depending on the movements of the hands and the body and the woman's moaning. Moreover, the assistant will note down the personal data and the history of the patient. The operator will record the objective and subjective difficulty of the performance, using a rating scale from 0 to 9. The length of the procedure, the volume of contrast used, the amount of radiations and the time of exposure of the patient will also be considered.

At the end of HSG both the gynaecologist and the radiologist will express their satisfaction upon the examination with a score from 0 to 10.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
25 Years to 42 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • infertility

Exclusion Criteria

  • hypersensitivity to iodine or radio-opaque contrast dye
  • cervicitis
  • genital bleeding
  • genital malignancy

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

failure rate to complete hysterosalpingography (HSG)

Time Frame: two years

Secondary Outcomes

  • the objective difficulty to perform HSG(two years)
  • the subjective difficulty to perform HSG(two years)
  • the fluoroscopic time(two years)
  • the length of the procedure of device application(two years)
  • the volume of contrast medium used(two years)
  • gynecologist satisfaction with the procedure(two years)
  • radiologist satisfaction with the procedure(two years)
  • the percentage of short-term complications(two years)
  • the percentage of long-term complications(two years)
  • correlation between patient medical history and the degree of pain experienced during the HSG procedure(two years)
  • the degree of pain experienced during the HSG procedure(two years)

Investigators

Sponsor
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Sponsor Class
Other

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

A Trial to Compare Three Methods of... | Clinical Trial