Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent On de Novo coRonary Artery Disease in Patients With High Bleeding Risk
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- High Bleeding Risk
- Sponsor
- Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez
- Enrollment
- 5
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Target Lesion Failure (TLF)
- Status
- Terminated
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Randomized, single-blind, single-center, non-inferiority clinical trial to compare target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months in high bleeding risk patients undergoing elective coronary percutaneous intervention comparing limus-eluting balloon vs. limus-eluting stents.
Detailed Description
Drug Eluting Stents (DES) are the devices of choice for coronary angioplasty, including in patients with high-bleeding risk. Different studies have been done to determine which strategy improves bleeding outcomes without risking the benefit of stenting. Different Double Anti-Platelet Therapy (DAPT) durations in different devices have shown that it is safe to reduce DAPT, with an increase in ischemic events but a better net clinical outcome. Safety and efficacy of Drug Eluting Balloons (DEB) were proved when it was compared with Bare Metal Stents (BMS) in de-novo coronary lesions by presenting no events of target vessel closure after treatment. Our hypothesis is that treating this group of high-bleeding risk patients with DEB will be no-inferior in terms of target vessel failure at 12 months when compared with DES for treatment of de-novo coronary lesions in high bleeding risk population, reducing incidence of significant bleeding events with DAPT reduction.
Investigators
Daniel Fernando Zazueta Salido
Principal Investigator
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients 18 years old or older with an ischemic de-novo lesion(s) in a 2.5 - 4.0 mm reference diameter coronary artery suitable for elective percutaneous coronary intervention, in context of acute coronary syndrome or chronic coronary syndrome with evidence of ischemia by non-invasive study or pressure guidewire that can be treated by DEB or DES, and has at least 1 major or 2 minor Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk criteria:
- •Major criteria:
- •Anticipated use of long-term oral anticoagulation
- •Severe or end-stage CKD (eGFR \<30 mL/min)
- •Hemoglobin \< 11 g/dL
- •Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or transfusion in the last 6 months, or any time, if recurrent.
- •Moderate or severe baseline thrombocytopenia (\<100,000/uL)
- •Chronic bleeding diathesis
- •Liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension
- •Active malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) within the past 12 months
Exclusion Criteria
- •STEMI undergoing primary PCI
- •Any ACS undergoing urgent PCI
- •Cardiogenic shock or resuscitation with uncertain neurological status at arrival to PCI
- •Unprotected left main lesion
- •Life expectancy \< 12 months
- •Reference vessel diameter \< 2.5 mm or \> 4.0 mm
- •Bifurcation lesion requiring 2-stent technique
- •Chronic total occlusion
- •In-stent restenosis
- •Dissection affecting the flow (TIMI\<3) or significant recoil (\>30% in main branch, \>50% in side branch) after predilatation
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Target Lesion Failure (TLF)
Time Frame: 12 months
Composed of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction related to the treated vessel or ischemia driven target lesion revascularization
Secondary Outcomes
- Target Lesion Revascularization(12 months)
- Cardiovascular death(12 months)
- Target Vessel Revascularization(12 months)
- Non-cardiovascular death(12 months)
- Subgroup analysis of target lesion failure(12 months)
- Myocardial Infarction related to the treated vessel(12 months)
- Target Vessel Failure (TVF)(12 months)
- Major Bleeding(12 months)
- Technical success(Periprocedural)
- Subgroup analysis of major bleeding events(12 months)