Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Three Different Root-canal Medicaments on Post-operative Pain in Re-treatment Cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 120
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 12 th hours.
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial compares the effects of intracanal medicaments on the incidence of postoperative pain and flare-up in asymptomatic retreatment cases.
Detailed Description
Introduction
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intracanal medicaments on the incidence of postoperative pain and flare-up in asymptomatic retreatment cases.
Methods: One hundred twenty patients with asymptomatic teeth with single-root, single-canal without spontaneous pain or swelling were included in the present study. All patients were previously undergone endodontic treatment but still had periapical radiolucencies. Patients were randomly and equally divided into three groups in which stratified randomization was performed based on the gender and the age of the patients. Intracanal medicaments were placed into the root canals following the removal of previous root canal fillings and re-instrumentation. Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2), chlorhexidine gel (CHX), calcium hydroxide, and chlorhexidine gel combinations were used as intracanal medicaments in the present study. Postoperative pain scores were recorded at 6 and 12 hours and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days using a visual analog scale (VAS). Sensitivity on percussion, spontaneous pain, swelling, and antibiotic and analgesic requirements of the patients were evaluated during clinical examinations performed postoperatively after 2 and 7 days.
p.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Single (Participant)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 20 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients between 20 - 65 years of ages
- •Patients who agree to participate this study
- •Not taking analgesic or antibiotics in the last week
- •Single root and single-canal incisor, canine, premolar teeth that have been treated only once before
- •Teeth with previous endodontic treatment but with insufficient root canal filling on radiographic examination
- •Teeth with periapical lesions and at least 2 years since the previous treatment, although root canal filling seems sufficient
- •Periapical radiolucency, teeth with increased or unchanged according to pre-treatment radiography (if available)
- •Teeth are asymptomatic
- •Patients who had good oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria
- •Pregnant patients and patients in lactation period
- •Having used corticosteroids in the last 6 months
- •Individuals with systemic diseases (endocarditis, immune system diseases,etc.) requiring antibiotic prophylaxis
- •Having received immunosuppressive therapy within the last week
- •Patients who had systemic or allergic sensitivty for the NSAIDs and local ananesthetics
- •The presence of advanced periodontal disease (probing depth > 4 mm)
- •The presence of a foreign body in the root canal that prevents entry (broken file, post, etc.)
- •Fracture or crack in the root
- •Teeth that cannot reach the working length due to calcification in the root canal and step formation
- •Teeth that cannot be restored due to excessive loss of material in the coronal structure
- •The presence of more than one adjacent tooth requiring endodontic treatment that may cause reflected pain in the same patient.
- •Teeth that develop any complications ( breakage of endodontic file, perforation, inability to determine the working length with the apex finder) during the removal of the canal filling material.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 12 th hours.
Time Frame: 12 th hour
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 24th hours.
Time Frame: 24 th hour
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 3th days.
Time Frame: 3th days
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 6th hours.
Time Frame: 6 th hours
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 4th days.
Time Frame: 4th days
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 2nd days.
Time Frame: 2nd days
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 5th days.
Time Frame: 5th days
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 6th days.
Time Frame: 6th days
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 7th days.
Time Frame: 7th days
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Hicran Dönmez Özkan
assistant professor
Aydin Adnan Menderes University