Evaluation of Two Versions of a Digital Problem Solving Tool for the General Public Specific for the COVID-19 Pandemic
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 397
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Treatment Credibility Scale
研究概览
简要总结
A digital problem solving tool was tailored to people in the general public with practical or emotional problems during COVID-19. Content analysis were used to account for the types of problems participants used the tool to solve. Participants were randomized to one of two versions of the problem solving tool, a simple and a more advanced graphical interface. These versions were compared on participant-rated usability, credibility and the level of actual interaction with the tool.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 16 Years 至 —（Child, Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •can use the Swedish language
- •access to, and knowledge how to use, a digital internet-capable device
排除标准
- •under 16 years
- •no practical or emotional problems during pandemic
研究组 & 干预措施
Traditional interface
Digital problem solving tool with a simple textbased graphical interface
干预措施: Digital problem solving tool (Behavioral)
Advanced interface
Digital problem solving tool with an advanced graphical interface and automatic functions
干预措施: Digital problem solving tool (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Treatment Credibility Scale
时间窗: immediately after the intervention
Self-rated assessment of treatment credibility, higher score is better
System Usability Scale
时间窗: immediately after the intervention
Self-rated assessment of usability, higher score is better
次要结局
- Use of intervention(immediately after the intervention)
研究者
Martin Kraepelien
Licensed clinical psychologist, Principal investigator, PhD
Karolinska Institutet