MedPath

Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Cortical Versus Cancellous Freeze Dried Bone Allograft

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Tooth Extraction
Interventions
Device: Cancellous FDBA
Device: cortical FDBA
Registration Number
NCT01588444
Lead Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare cortical and cancellous freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) materials in the preservation of alveolar bone following extraction of non-molar teeth. The primary objective is to histologically evaluate and compare the healing of extraction sockets of non-molar teeth grafted with cortical FDBA versus cancellous FDBA for ridge preservation.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • single rooted tooth requiring extraction with future dental implant placement
Exclusion Criteria
  • smoking > 10 cigarettes per day poorly controlled diabetes

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
cancellous FDBA (LifeNet)Cancellous FDBAgrafting with cancellous mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (LifeNet Health)
cortical FDBA (LifeNet)cortical FDBACORTICAL FREEZE-DRIED BONE ALLOGRAFT (from LifeNet Health)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Histologic Percentage of Vital Bone Formation18-20 weeks after grafting

Histologic percentage of vital bone formation in bone cores

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

UT Health Science Center Dental School

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath