Comparison of Absorbable Sutures in Perineal Laceration Repair
Phase 4
Terminated
- Conditions
- Perineal Laceration Repair
- Registration Number
- NCT00223119
- Lead Sponsor
- Medtronic - MITG
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the difference in pain scales between absorbable suture types for second-degree perineal laceration repair.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
- At least 18 years of age
- Able to sign informed consent
- Vaginal laceration that requires sutures but does not involve the anal sphincter (third-degree tear) or rectal mucosa (fourth-degree tear)
Exclusion Criteria
- Inability to speak and understand English or Spanish
- Previous diagnosis of vulvodynia, dyspareunia, or other chronic vulvar pain syndrome
- Extensive perineal warts or vulvar varicosities
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms differentiate absorbable sutures in perineal laceration healing?
How do absorbable sutures compare to non-absorbable materials in postpartum perineal repair outcomes?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict optimal healing with absorbable suture types in obstetrics?
What adverse events are associated with absorbable sutures in perineal laceration repair and how are they managed?
What are the current alternatives to absorbable sutures for second-degree perineal lacerations in clinical practice?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
US Surgical
🇺🇸Norwalk, Connecticut, United States
US Surgical🇺🇸Norwalk, Connecticut, United States