CTRI/2022/06/043135
Completed
Phase 3
Comparative Evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcome of root canal treatment obturated with bio-ceramic sealer and bio ceramic gutta-percha against Resin based sealer and gutta percha in patients with periapical radiolucency - A Randomized Clinical Study.
Aishwarya Jain0 sites60 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K047- Periapical abscess without sinus
- Sponsor
- Aishwarya Jain
- Enrollment
- 60
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\.Systemically healthy patients (Category: American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2 or less than 2\) 25 between 18 – 65 years of age with maxillary or mandibular teeth diagnosed with symptomatic or asymptomatic apical periodontitis or acute exacerbation of chronic abscess will be included in the study.
- •2\.Diagnosis will be based on clinical evaluation. Patients having positive response to tender on percussion and no response or extremely delayed response with electric pulp test will be included in the study.
- •3\.Radiographic lesions that show periapical radiolucency or peri\-radicular radiolucency with Periapical index (PAI) Score \>3 will be included in the study.
- •4\.Re\-root canal treatment with periapical lesions with PAI Score \>3 will be included in the study.
- •5\.A written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and only those patients ready to sign the consent form will be included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\.Pregnant and lactating women will be excluded.
- •2\.Patients having uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension and immunocompromised will be excluded from the study.
- •3\.Patients with history to any drug abuse will be excluded from the study.
- •4\.Patients having teeth with poor prognosis, open apices, internal/external resorption, fractured roots or visibly cracked tooth, grade 3 mobility, severe periodontal bone loss with pocket depth of 6 mm or more than 6mm will be excluded from the study.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Comparative evaluation of clinical and radiographic success of three different pulp therapies in paediatric dental patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical StudyCTRI/2024/07/070225Ayisha Beevi T P
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Comparing Tooth Repair Medicines After Laser and Traditional Pulp Therapy: Which Works Better?CTRI/2024/06/069218Dr S Dhivya Shanthi
Recruiting
Phase 3
A research comparing the height of the bone after implant placement in sinus augmented Maxilla on both sides with comparisons of blood clot and Platelet Rich FibriCTRI/2023/08/056786Bathri Elangovan
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparision of Protooth Cement and Biodentine in Indirect Pulp capping in Children.Health Condition 1: K040- PulpitisCTRI/2024/05/067871Dr N Devi Vyshnavi
Recruiting
Not Applicable
clinical evaluation of 2 different types of crowns when placed with different techniques of crown placementHealth Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecifiedCTRI/2022/12/048617Dr Amol Patil