Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03600012
NCT03600012CompletedNot Applicable

Investigating of Effects of Lower Extremities Cycling Functional Electrıcal Stimulation Training On Gait Parameters In Children With Diplegic Cerebral Palsy

Hacettepe University0 sites20 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
20
Primary Endpoint
Walking energy expenditure measurements were done with breath by breath method.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of cycling functional electrical stimulation applied to the lower extremities of children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP) on the gait parameters and daily living activities.

Detailed Description

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a broadly-defined neurological disorder that encompasses brain injury or malformation in a child's brain that occurs before, during, or immediately after birth and results in impaired motor control. Because of the broad definition of CP, people with CP can exhibit a very wide range of symptoms, and no two people with CP will exhibit the same symptoms. However, people with CP generally have difficulty moving parts of their bodies normally because of muscle weakness or paralysis, impaired muscle coordination, and/or spasticity. Impaired motor control can also be accompanied by intellectual impairment, seizures, or sensory impairment.

Physical impairment can severely limit participation in physical activity by people with CP, as is true for anyone with physical impairments. Lack of physical activity can lead to the development of any number of chronic diseases, especially in children with disabilities like CP. Exercise is an effective method for mitigating the negative secondary health effects of neuromuscular diseases like CP, but how can someone with CP exercise despite their impaired motor control, especially when 31% of children with CP have limited walking ability.

Cycling is an exercise that challenges the muscular and cardiovascular systems, potentially leading to improved health, fitness, and well-being. Cycling with functional electrical stimulation (FES) has been primarily used by people with spinal cord injury; improvements have been seen in bone mineral density, muscle strength (force-generating capacity), and cardiorespiratory measures. Recent reports indicated benefits for people after stroke; improvements in strength and motor control were seen when an FES cycling program was added to traditional rehabilitation. However, there have been no reports of FES cycling for children with CP.

Cycling with FES may be a suitable intervention for with CP because the seated position decreases balance demands, and FES can create or augment pedaling forces. Many people with CP may be incapable of generating sufficient forces during cycling to reach the exercise intensity needed for optimal fitness-related outcomes and musculoskeletal benefits.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
6 Years to 16 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • cerebral palsy
  • classified in levels I - II of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
  • able to follow and accept verbal instruction

Exclusion Criteria

  • any orthopaedic surgery or botulinum toxin injection in the past 6 months,
  • children whose parents refused to participate

Arms & Interventions

intervention group

Experimental

intervention group: Cycling Functional Electrical Stimulation & Physiotherapy

Children in intervention group were taken in a therapy program withRT 300 SLSA FES system for cycling functional electrical stimulation training additionly to physiotherapy program including weight shifting, knee and hip strenging and gait training for 8 weeks, 3 sessions in a week and 45 min per session.

Intervention: Cycling Functional Electrical Stimulation (Other)

intervention group

Experimental

intervention group: Cycling Functional Electrical Stimulation & Physiotherapy

Children in intervention group were taken in a therapy program withRT 300 SLSA FES system for cycling functional electrical stimulation training additionly to physiotherapy program including weight shifting, knee and hip strenging and gait training for 8 weeks, 3 sessions in a week and 45 min per session.

Intervention: Physiotherapy (Other)

control group

Active Comparator

control group: Physiotherapy

Children with cp in control group were taken physiotherapy program including weight shifting, knee and hip strenging and gait training for 8 weeks, 3 times in a week, 45 min per session.

Intervention: Physiotherapy (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Walking energy expenditure measurements were done with breath by breath method.

Time Frame: change from baseline gross motor funciton at 8 weeks

Walking energy expenditure measurements were done with breath by breath method using an open-circuit indirect calorimeter (Vmax 29c, Sensormedics, USA).

Gait was assessed using a three-dimensional Gait Analysis motion system.

Time Frame: change from baseline gross motor funciton at 8 weeks

Gait was assessed using a three-dimensional, seven-camera, VICON 512 motion measurement system (Oxford Metrics Ltd., Oxford, UK). The VICON Clinical Manager software was used for calculating and plotting temperospatial parameters, sagittal plane joint motion data, and kinematic data. Fifteen reflective markers were placed on specific anatomic landmarks bilaterally of the subject's pelvis, thighs, shanks and feet according to the marker protocol of Davis et al.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Gross motor function was measured using GMFM.(change from baseline gross motor funciton at 8 weeks)
  • Modified Ashworth (MAS) scale was used to evaluate muscle tone.(change from baseline gross motor funciton at 8 weeks)
  • The 30s Repetition Maximum test was used to assess functional muscle strength of the lower extremities.(change from baseline gross motor funciton at 8 weeks)
  • Balance was assessed with pediatric balance scale (PBS).(change from baseline gross motor funciton at 8 weeks)
  • Dynamic balance was assessed withTime up & go test (TUG).(change from baseline gross motor funciton at 8 weeks)
  • Quality of life was assessed withThe Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ-PF50).(change from baseline gross motor funciton at 8 weeks)
  • Daily living activity was assessed with Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory.(change from baseline gross motor funciton at 8 weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Duygu Turker

principal investigator

Hacettepe University

Similar Trials