A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial For Comparison of Dental Putty-Aided Endotracheal Intubation Versus Gauze Roll-Aided Endotracheal Intubation in Children with Left-Sided Complete Cleft Lip, Alveolus, and Palate.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
研究概览
简要总结
This prospective randomized clinical trial compares dental putty aided versus gauze roll aided endotracheal intubation in children less than 5 years of age and ASA 1,2 with children having left sided complete cleft lip, alveolus and palate.
Sixty patients will be allocated into two groups of 30 each. After standard anaesthetic induction, either dental putty or gauze roll will be placed in the cleft before laryngoscopy.
Primary outcome is intubation time in seconds.
Secondary outcomes are number of attempts of intubation, Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic visualisation, need for external laryngeal manipulation, ease of intubation and complications like desaturation, trauma and failed intubation.
Dental putty is expected to provide better glottic visualization, shorter intubation time, lesser attempts of intubation, and fewer complications than the conventional gauze roll technique.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 1.00 Day(s) 至 5.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Children aged less than 5 years
- •ASA physical status 1 or 2
- •Diagnosed with uncorrected left sided complete cleft lip, alveolus and palate.
排除标准
- •Children with anticipated difficult airway unrelated to cleft
- •ASA physical status greater than 2.
研究者
Pavan Dhulkhed
SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad.