Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of periosteal pedicle graft compared to connective tissue graft in combination with coronally advanced flap technique in treatment of millers class I and II gingival recession A randomized clinical study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2/3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To clinically evaluate and compare the effectiveness of Periosteal Pedicle Graft compared To Connective Tissue Graft in combination with Coronally Advanced Flap Technique in treatment of Miller’s Class I And II Gingival Recession.
研究概览
简要总结
This randomized clinical study aims to compare the effectiveness of Periosteal Pedicle Graft (PPG) and Connective Tissue Graft (CTG) in combination with the Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) technique for treating Miller’s Class I and II gingival recession. Thirty systemically healthy patients, aged 18-50, will be recruited and randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (CTG + CAF) and Group B (PPG + CAF), with 15 participants in each. Preoperative care includes scaling and root planing, followed by reevaluation after 4-6 weeks. Clinical parameters such as plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, and recession depth will be recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The study will assess root coverage, keratinized tissue width, recession coverage, and esthetic outcomes. Data will be analyzed using SPSS software, and the study will follow ethical guidelines with informed consent from all participants. The objective is to determine if there are significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two grafting techniques in terms of root coverage and periodontal health.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 50.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients with localized multiple gingival recession (Miller Class I or II) on two contralateral sites of the maxillary or mandibular arch with a minimum 2-3 mm recession depth.
- •Age range: 18-50 years.
- •Systemically healthy patients with no contraindications for periodontal surgery.
- •Plaque Index Score (Silness J and Loe.
- •H, 1964)less than 1 post-phase I therapy.
排除标准
- •Pregnancy or lactation.
- •Systemic diseases affecting treatment outcome.
- •Patient using tobacco in smoke or smokeless form.
- •Alcoholics and patients with history of drug abuse.
- •Use of antibiotics or long-term anti-inflammatory medication within the past three months.
结局指标
主要结局
To clinically evaluate and compare the effectiveness of Periosteal Pedicle Graft compared To Connective Tissue Graft in combination with Coronally Advanced Flap Technique in treatment of Miller’s Class I And II Gingival Recession.
时间窗: at baseline at 3 months at 6 months
次要结局
- Secondary outcomes include post-operative pain, morbidity, healing time, keratinized tissue gain, tissue aesthetics, donor site complications (CTG), & surgical ease, with PPG favoring recovery & CTG excelling in tissue stability.(at baseline , at 3 months, at 6 months)
研究者
Dr.Deepti Reddy
M.A. Dental Sciences and Research Centre