MedPath

Efficacy And Tolerability Of Asymmetric Split Regimen For Bowel Preparation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Colon Preparation
Polyps Colorectal
Interventions
Drug: 1L PEG-Asc
Registration Number
NCT06916689
Lead Sponsor
ASST Rhodense
Brief Summary

The investigators aimed to compare the efficacy for bowel cleansing of a split-dose regimen with a low morning dose of PEG solution (Asymmetric; 25% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure and 75% of the dose is given on the day before) with the standard split-dose regimen in patients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy using a very low volume bowel preparation (1L PEG+Ascorbate). Consecutive outpatients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy were enrolled in a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to: group A, asymmetric split dose regimen (0,75 L of PEG + ASC the day before and 0,25 L 2:30 hours before colonoscopy); group B, symmetric split dose regimen (0,5 L of PEG + ASC the day before and 0,5 L 3 hours before colonoscopy). Primary endpoint was the proportion of adequate bowel cleansing. Moreover, all patients filled in a validated, nurse-administered questionnaire assessing compliance, tolerability and safety of bowel preparation.

Detailed Description

Prospective observational, single-blind study conducted in two endoscopy centers belonging to the same Local Health Authority. The two bowel preparation regimens under study (symmetric split and asymmetric split) will be compared in a population of patients undergoing screening for colorectal cancer.

Patient enrollment, product prescription, and the subsequent pre-endoscopic evaluation of safety, tolerability, acceptability, and compliance will be carried out by an assistant who will not be blinded to the type of preparation used.

Endoscopic evaluation, however, will be performed by an experienced endoscopist who will be blinded to the type of bowel preparation administered to the patient.

The bowel preparation product used consists of a very low-volume solution of Macrogol (3350) + Ascorbic Acid (1 liter) (PLENVU®, Norgine).

Bowel cleanliness level assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale adn overall tolerability of bowel preparation are primary outcomes.

Patient compliance and safety; the number of detected lesions, the percentage of complete colonoscopies, the duration of the colonoscopy, the degree of discomfort/pain perceived by the patient during the examination, and procedure-related complications are secondary outcomes.

Patients will be assigned to the two treatment groups according to a computer-generated sequence.

Data will be expressed as mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables and as frequencies for qualitative variables. The comparison between the two groups will be performed using the t-test for quantitative variables and the chi-square (χ²) test for qualitative variables.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
236
Inclusion Criteria
  • All patients scheduled as outpatient for screening or surveillance colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria
  • Inpatients
  • refusal of split dose regimen for bowel preparation
  • previous history of colorectal resection
  • severe cardiac disease
  • advanced (stage IV and V) chronic kidney disease
  • pregnancy; ileus
  • suspected bowel obstruction or toxic megacolon
  • known inflammatory bowel disease
  • known or suspected allergy to PEG.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Asymmetric split dose preparation1L PEG-Asc75% of the dose is given on the day before of the procedure and 25% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure
Symmetric split dose preparation1L PEG-Asc50% of the dose is given on the day before of the procedure and 50% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Quality of bowel prepreparation2 days

Quality of bowel prepreparation/cleanliness scored using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Each segment of the colon received a score from 0 to 3, and these segment scores were summed for a total BBPS score ranging from 0 to 9. The preparation was considered adequate when BBPS score was ≥ 6 with a score with at least 2 points in any segment

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Adenoma detection rate2 days

rate of patients with at least one adenoma

Rate of the occurrence of adverse events2 days

Rate of the occurrence of adverse events (bad taste in mouth, gastric fullness, nausea or vomiting, bloating, abdominal pain, headache)

Compliance2 days

Compliance was assessed by the amount of intake of study agents using a 3-point scale: 1 (100% intake), 2 (≥ 75% intake), and 3 (\< 75% intake).

Tolerability of the preparation, as reported by the patient on a Validated Questionnaire2 days

Tolerability was evaluated assessing how patient finds tolerable the bowel preparation by using a 4-point scale: 1 (Easy), 2 (Acceptable), 3 (Somewhat difficult), 4 (Very difficult), plus a Visual Scale with a number from 0 (untolerable) to 100 (very tolerable).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

ASST Rhodense

🇮🇹

Garbagnate Milanese, Lombardia, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath