Immediate and 12-week Effects of Exercise Versus Exercise and Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization for Plantar Fasciopathy Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 83
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- The Foot Health Status Questionnaire Pain Subscale Score
研究概览
简要总结
This study compares the addition instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) to a program of home strengthening and stretching exercises to see whether adding weekly IASTM treatments improves plantar fasciopathy pain and plantar fascia stiffness.
详细描述
Plantar fasciopathy (PF) is the most common cause of inferior heel pain, and approximately 40% of patients report symptoms two years following initial diagnosis. Exercise therapy, including gastrocnemius and plantar fascia stretching, and high-load strengthening have been shown to improve plantar fascia pain and function; however, not everyone improves with these interventions, and they require several weeks or months to be effective. The addition of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) techniques may improve these outcomes. Moreover, shear wave elastography (SWE) is an imaging technology that may provide helpful information regarding PF diagnosis and prognosis. Therefore, research is required to investigate changes in plantar fascia stiffness following exercise and IASTM interventions.
This study is divided into two Parts. Part I is a parallel-group, pre-test post-test randomized controlled superiority trial comparing the long-term effects of stretching and strengthening exercises (SS) (Group 1, n=35) versus SS plus IASTM (SS+IASTM, Group 2, n=35) in subjects with PF. The study is approved by the local Intuitional Review Board. The Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines for reporting of randomized interventional trials will be followed. Exercise interventions will be reported according to the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) guideline. Part II is a pre-test, post-test comparison of the short-term effects of IASTM on PF. Subjects from Group 2 of Part I (n=35) and a age and sex-matched healthy comparison group (Group 3, n=35) will participate in Part II.
Random group allocation into SS and SS+IASTM Groups will be performed by an independent statistician using the R Statistics package using a 1:1 allocation ratio with permuted block sizes of 2 to 6. Although it is not possible to blind study participants, the investigators performing the weekly interventions and measurements will be blinded to the subjects' group allocation.
After randomization subjects will receive a booklet that describes their condition and contains exercise instructions and an exercise training and medication usage diary. Group 1 will receive a sheet listing evidence for the beneficial effects of stretching and high-load strengthening. Group 2 will additionally receive information regarding the hypothesized benefits of IASTM. After group allocation and reading the appropriate booklet, subjects will complete the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ), which contains six items requiring subjects to rate the credibility of the intervention and their expectations.
Both groups will perform an identical exercise program but will additionally receive once weekly IASTM treatments over an 8-week period. The weekly and total treatment time in Groups 1 and 2 will be the same, 15 minutes/week for 8 weeks. Group 3 (Comparison Group) will be recruited in clusters of five after every 5 subjects are recruited into Group 2 (SS+IASTM) and will be matched to that group's age and BMI.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Random group allocation into Groups 1 and 2 will be performed using a 1:1 allocation ratio with permuted block sizes of 2 to 6. The investigators responsible for the weekly progression of the stretching and strengthening exercise protocol and the outcome assessor will be masked to the participants' assigned groups. The investigators providing instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization will not be blinded to group assignment.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
The Foot Health Status Questionnaire Pain Subscale Score
时间窗: Week 8
This self-report questionnaire assesses individuals' foot health and function. The pain subscale evaluates type of pain and its severity and duration.
次要结局
- Ankle range of motion(Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12)
- First metatarsophalangeal range of motions(Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12)
- Visual Analog Scale Pain Score(Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12.)
- The Foot Health Status Questionnaire Foot Function Subscale Score(Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12)
- Patient Acceptable Symptom State(Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Phone visits at weeks 9, 10, 11.)
- Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire(Baseline visit)
- The Foot Health Status Questionnaire Footwear Subscale Score(Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12)
- The Foot Health Status Questionnaire General Foot Health Subscale Score(Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12)
- Plantar Fascia Shear Wave Velocity(week 0, 4, 8 and 12)
- Physical Activity Level(Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12)
