跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01497548
NCT01497548Unknown3 期

A Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Methylphenidate as an Add on Therapy for Mirtazapine in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Cancer Patients Under Palliative Care

University of Malaya1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2011年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
3 期
入组人数
120
试验地点
1
主要终点
depressive symptoms

研究概览

简要总结

Primary Objective To determine the efficacy of Methylphenidate as add on therapy to mirtazapine in the treatment of depression in cancer patients under palliative care Hypothesis Methyphenidate add on to mirtazapine treated subjects will show significant early reduction in (Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale) MADRS between baseline and Day 3.

Secondary Objective

  1. To determine the efficacy of Methylphenidate as add on therapy to mirtazapine in the treatment of anxiety in cancer patients under palliative care.

Hypothesis Methyphenidate add on to mirtazapine treated subjects will show significant early reduction in anxiety score of HADS than Mirtazepine alone treated subjects between baseline and Day 3. 2. To determine the efficacy of Methylphenidate as add on therapy to mirtazapine in reducing distress in cancer patients under palliative care.

Hypothesis Methyphenidate add on to mirtazapine treated subjects will show significant early reduction in distress score of distress thermometer than Mirtazepine alone treated subjects between baseline and Day 3. 3. To determine the efficacy of Methylphenidate as add on therapy to mirtazapine in improving function in cancer patients under palliative care.

Hypothesis Methyphenidate add on to mirtazapine treated subjects will show increase in the (Eastern Cooperation Group performance status) ECOG score than Mirtazepine alone treated subjects between baseline and Day 3 4. To determine the efficacy of Methylphenidate as add on therapy to mirtazapine in reducing somatic complaints in cancer patients under palliative care.

Hypothesis Methyphenidate add on to mirtazapine treated subjects will show significant early reduction in the score of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Fatigue than Mirtazapine alone treated subjects between baseline and Day 3.

详细描述

Background

Cancer remains one of the most feared illnesses and the diagnosis of cancer has huge psychological impact on the patients and their care-takers (Knobf, 2007). Depression is one the most common psychiatric sequella (Derogatis et al., 1983)2 and affects the quality of life, compliance to treatment, disease advancement, tolerability to pain and fatigue in cancer patients (Bennett et al., 2004; Sommerset, 2004; Green et al., 2009). However, it is likely that depression is under-recognized and under-treated in cancer patients (Kadan-Lottick et al., 2005).

Depressed feelings manifest in a spectrum ranging from normal sadness to a variety of mood disturbances and clinical presentations. It is challenging to differentiate clinical depression from "normal" emotional distress in cancer patients and the somatic symptoms such as fatigue, loss of appetite or weight, sleep difficulties, poor memory and concentration may mirror the physiological symptoms caused by cancer or its treatment (McDaniel and Musselman, 1995; Masie and Popkin, 1998; Cochinov, 2001; Jesse et al., 2008). This complicates the diagnosis of depression in cancer patients (McDaniel and Musselman, 1995; Masie and Popkin, 1998; Cochinov, 2001; Pasquini and Biond, 2007; Jesse et al., 2008).

Many studies have investigated the prevalence of depression in cancer in the past decades. A previous review by Mc Daniel et al, reported a prevalence of major depression ranging from 4.8% to 9.2% based on studies using standardized diagnostic interviews on cancer outpatients. Prevalence rates were higher in the admitted cancer patients (8% for Major Depression and 15% to 36% for all depressive disorders)(McDaniel and Musselman, 1995). A preliminary systematic review on the prevalence of depression in cancer patients was conducted by the investigator of this study. It showed that major depressive disorder was as high as 10.8% in cancer patients based on structured clinical interview.

In addition to the high prevalence, uncertainty exists with respect to the optimal treatment of depression in cancer. Although a huge number of studies investigated the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for depression in general population, the number of randomized, controlled trials of antidepressants on depression in cancer patient conducted is limited(Challman and Lipsky, 2000; Raison and Miller, 2003). A comprehensive systematic review looking into the effectiveness and tolerability of antidepressant treatment in depressed cancer patients was performed and published by Rodin et al in 2007. Although 7 trials were identified, the authors commented that the number of positive randomized trials was limited and there is a need for more rigorous studies on other newer agents or alternative treatment option (Raison and Miller, 2003). The preliminary systematic review conducted by the investigator of this study also came to the same conclusion.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Male or female, aged >18 years.
  • Current DSM IV diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder.
  • Under palliative care.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of cancer.
  • Not on any antidepressants

排除标准

  • Clinical significant abnormal laboratory values.
  • Clinically significant abnormal ECG.
  • Documented history of other psychiatric diagnosis (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, organic brain disorder, dementia etc.)

研究组 & 干预措施

Methylphenidate add on to Mirtazapine

Experimental

Methylphenidate add on to the usual treatment (Mirtazapine)

干预措施: Methylphenidate (Drug)

Placebo add on to Mirtazapine

Placebo Comparator

Non active compund add on to the usual treatment (Mirtazapine)

干预措施: Placebo (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

depressive symptoms

时间窗: 3 to 28 days

measured with Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale

次要结局

  • Distress level(3 to 28 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Ng Chong Guan

Principal Investigator

University of Malaya

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验