跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/08/093110
CTRI/2025/08/093110尚未招募不适用

A comparative study of endotracheal tube cuff pressure between two techniques, using Pressure-Volume loop (PV-L) and Minimal occlusive volume (MOV) in patients undergoing laparascopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia, a prospective randomised controlled study.

未提供1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 66 人开始时间: 2025年8月25日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
66
试验地点
1
主要终点
The PV loop technique would be more accurate than MOV technique in acheiving the desired ETTc pressure in patients undergoing laparascopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia.

研究概览

简要总结

A comparative study of endotracheal tube cuff pressure between two techniques, using Pressure-Volume loop (PV-L) and Minimal occlusive volume (MOV) in patients undergoing laparascopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia, a prospective randomised controlled study.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1.ASA Grade I and II, both genders undergoing Laparascopic Cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia.
  • 2.Age between 18 years and 60 years.
  • 3.BMI less than 30kg.

排除标准

  • 1.Patients not giving consent to the study,
  • Patients with anticipated difficult intubation,
  • Emergency intubations,
  • Patients with high risk of pulmonary aspiration, pre op sore throat & Upper respiratory infections.

结局指标

主要结局

The PV loop technique would be more accurate than MOV technique in acheiving the desired ETTc pressure in patients undergoing laparascopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia.

时间窗: The ETT cuff pressure will be measure post intubation and pre extubation.

次要结局

  • 1.To compare the endotracheal cuff volume with the two techniques(2.To compare the incidence of sore throat, cough & hoarseness of voice.)

研究者

发起方
未提供
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Himason Rai

Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences,

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验