跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2022/08/045102
CTRI/2022/08/045102尚未招募2 期

Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Chitosan vs Gelfoam as a Hemostatic Agent After Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study

Self Dr Parvaket Patel0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • 1.Patients indicated for surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars
  • 2.Patients willing to participate in the study
  • 3.Patients undergoing oral anticoagulative therapy requiring surgical extraction of mandibular third molars
  • 4.Patients without any history of chronic illness

排除标准

  • 1.Patients who are allergic to shellfish
  • 2.Patients who are allergic to gelatin/gelatin-based products
  • 3.Patients presenting in a hypercoagulable state
  • 4.Patients with renal dysfunction, liver disorders, asthma, pregnancy.
  • 5.Patients allergic to Chitosan/ Chitin and its byproducts.
  • 6.Patients with an intellectual deficit

研究者

发起方
Self Dr Parvaket Patel

相似试验

A clinical study to evaluate the efficiency of two... | 临床试验