跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06638736
NCT06638736撤回不适用

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Sutures vs Staples for High Tension Closures

University of Kansas Medical Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2020年7月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
试验地点
1
主要终点
Scored cosmetic appearance by blinded physician

研究概览

简要总结

The study aims to compare outcomes in patient comfort, cosmetic appearance, and complication rates between sutures and staples in high tension areas for closures of skin cancers excised in a dermatology clinic.

详细描述

I. Purpose, Background and Rationale A. Aim and Hypotheses

  1. Standard of care for epidermal wound closure in dermatology is generally considered to be sutures, however many specialties utilize staples due to their increased speed of closure. In particular, high tension wound areas within dermatology may be more suitable for closure with staples given their higher tensile strength when compared to sutures.

  2. The hypothesis is that for high tension areas:

  3. Staples will provide improved cosmetic outcomes compared with sutures along with a reduction in closure times.

  4. Patient comfort during the placement of staples, as well as the healing and removal process, will be no different than what patients with sutures experience.

B. Background and Significance

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Physician evaluating scars post closure will be blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18 and over
  • Willing to return to KU for follow up clinic visits on at least 2 occasions
  • Lesion location on high tension area as defined by: back, shoulder, scapula, elbow, scalp
  • Incisions between the lengths of 3cm to 12 cm
  • Skin pathology as defined by BCC, SCC, Melanoma
  • No known history of keloid or excessive scar formation
  • No known contraindication or skin sensitivity to suture or staple material
  • No contraindication to lidocaine with epinephrine

排除标准

  • <18 years old
  • Non english speaking
  • Needs surrogate decision maker

研究组 & 干预措施

Suture group

Other

1/2 of the total number of patients will be randomized into the suture group (excision wound will be closed with suture), the intervention is the method of closure (sutures or staples)

干预措施: Wound Closure with sutures vs staples (Other)

Staples group

Other

1/2 of the total number of patients will be randomized into the staples group (excision wound will be closed with staples), the intervention is the method of closure (sutures or staples)

干预措施: Wound Closure with sutures vs staples (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Scored cosmetic appearance by blinded physician

时间窗: 6 months post procedure

A blinded physician will grade the cosmetic appearance of the scar using a visual analog scale and Vancouver scar scale

Scored cosmetic appearance by patient

时间窗: 6 months post procedure

The patient will grade the cosmetic appearance of the scar using a visual analog scale

Patient self reported comfort with placement of either sutures or staples

时间窗: at time of surgery

Patients will fill out a survey after either suture or staple placement to assess how comfortable placement of the sutures or staples was. They will be asked to rate questions related to their comfort on a scale of 1-10.

Patient self reported comfort with removal of either sutures or staples

时间窗: 2 weeks after placement

Patients will fill out a survey after either suture or staple removal to assess how comfortable the removal of the sutures or staples was. They will be asked to rate questions related to their comfort on a scale of 1-10.

Scored cosmetic appearance by blinded physician

时间窗: 2 weeks post procedure

A blinded physician will grade the cosmetic appearance of the scar using a visual analog scale and Vancouver scar scale

Scored cosmetic appearance by patient

时间窗: 2 weeks post procedure

The patient will grade the cosmetic appearance of the scar using a visual analog scale

次要结局

  • Number and types of complications reported(procedure until 6 month follow up)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验