Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/ACTRN12615000872538
ACTRN12615000872538
Recruiting
Not Applicable

A prospective randomized study comparing the efficacy of two different concentrations of Intranasal Fentanyl: the standard formulation (50mcg/mL) and the concentrated formulation (300mcg/mL) in adults presenting to Frankston Emergency Department (ED) with moderate to severe pain.

A/Prof Pamela Rosengarten0 sites110 target enrollmentAugust 21, 2015

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
A/Prof Pamela Rosengarten
Enrollment
110
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
August 21, 2015
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
A/Prof Pamela Rosengarten

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 1\. Age 18 years to 75 years of age
  • 2\. Self\-report pain severity as being 6 or more on the standard 10 point verbal rating scale (0 is none, 10 is worst pain imaginable)
  • 3\. Medical recommendation for parenteral analgesia (treating doctor’s discretion)
  • 4\. Pain from any cause other than the 3 specific exclusions (see below)

Exclusion Criteria

  • 1\. Known allergy or previous adverse reaction to fentanyl
  • 2\. Patients over 75 years of age
  • 3\. Use of oral, intranasal, transdermal or parenteral narcotic analgesia in previous 4 hours (either pre\-hospital or in the emergency department) \[NB. Pre\-hospital use of short\-acting inhaled methoxyfluorane alone or non\-narcotic analgesics do not constitute an exclusion]
  • 4\. MAO Inhibitor antidepressant use within last 14 days
  • 5\. Myasthenia gravis
  • 6\. Haemodynamic instability (eg HR over 120/min or BP under 90 mmHg) with the need for time critical interventions of any type
  • 7\. Suspicion of any of the following medical conditions:
  • myocardial ischaemia (concern re transient hypotension from fentanyl)
  • suspected subarachnoid haemorrhage (concern re transient hypotension from fentanyl)
  • migraine (specific proven therapy)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
COMPARISON OF TWO DRUGS IN THE TREATMENT OF ORAL LICHEN PLANUSHealth Condition 1: L438- Other lichen planus
CTRI/2023/03/050453OT APPLICABLE
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Study comparing in children surgical drainage with medical drainage to evacuate the excess liquid around the lung in case of pneumoniaParapneumonic pleural effusionMedDRA version: 17.0Level: PTClassification code 10071699Term: Infectious pleural effusionSystem Organ Class: 10021881 - Infections and infestationsMedDRA version: 17.0Level: PTClassification code 10014569Term: Empyema drainageSystem Organ Class: 10042613 - Surgical and medical proceduresTherapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Bacterial Infections and Mycoses [C01]
EUCTR2014-002221-35-BEHôpital Universitaire Des Enfants Reine Fabiola
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Comparison of the effect of autologous cell therapy with standard treatment in patients with diabetic foot
EUCTR2016-001397-15-CZInstitut klinické a experimentální medicíny40
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
A study was undertaken to see the spinal anaesthesia consequences in patients undergoing surgeries below navel region while using the local anaesthetics like levobupivacaine, bupivacaine and ropivacaine along with an additive nalbuphineHealth Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
CTRI/2023/04/051813PSG Institute of medical sciences and Research
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
To compare the effectiveness of two group of nerve blocks in patients undergoing upper arm and shoulder orthopaedic surgeries.Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
CTRI/2022/02/040120Dr Eva Sharma