跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04616911
NCT04616911Unknown不适用

External Anal Sphincter-Sparing Seton After Rerouting Versus Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) In Treatment Of Complex Anal Fistula: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Mansoura University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 77 人开始时间: 2020年11月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
77
试验地点
2
主要终点
Clinical Healing of anal fistula

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to compare the efficacy of two surgical techniques in treatment of complex anal fistulas. The first technique involves rerouting of the fistula tract with placement of a vessel loop seton around the internal anal sphincter, sparing the external sphincter whereas the second technique entails ligation of inter-sphincteric fistulous tract (LIFT). The main objectives of the study are to assess the success rate, time to healing, change in quality of life, and complications of each procedure including fecal incontinence.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adult patients of either sex with complex anal fistula including high trans-sphincteric, supra-sphincteric, extra-sphincteric, and anterior fistula in female

排除标准

  • Patients with simple anal fistulas, including intersphicnteric and low trans-sphincteric fistulas.
  • ASA IV and V (The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification system) unfit patients
  • Patient with any grade of anal incontinence.
  • Patients with concomitant anal pathology.

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical Healing of anal fistula

时间窗: 12 months after surgery

Clinical healing is assessed by clinical examination during follow-up and is defined as Complete epithelization of the anal wound with no residual fistula tract or external opening or discharge

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sameh Emile

Associate professor of surgery

Mansoura University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验