跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01751061
NCT01751061已完成不适用

Improving Decision Making for Patients With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

Duke University8 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 416 人开始时间: 2013年1月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
416
试验地点
8
主要终点
Change in Clinician-surrogate Concordance Scale Score

研究概览

简要总结

Deciding about prolonged life support for critically ill patients can be very difficult. Therefore, the investigators are doing a study to see if an internet-based decision aid can improve the quality of decision making for substitute decision makers of patients who are in the intensive care unit (ICU).

详细描述

The process of making a decision about whether or not to provide prolonged life support is seriously deficient among clinicians and the surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients. To address this problem, we propose a randomized, controlled trial to determine if an innovative web-based decision aid compared to usual care control can improve the quality of decision making (defined as clinician-surrogate concordance for prognosis, quality of communication, and medical comprehension), reduce surrogates' psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress syndrome disorder (PTSD) symptoms), and reduce patients' health care costs over 6-month follow up. We will enroll 410 surrogate decision makers for 273 patients (expected average of 1.5 surrogates per patient). This study has the potential both to improve how clinicians and surrogates interact in intensive care units and to increase the likelihood that life support decisions are aligned with patients' values.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Decision aid

Experimental

Web-based decision aid (decision support tool) provided to surrogate decision maker

干预措施: Decision aid (Behavioral)

Usual care

Active Comparator

usual care in an intensive care unit setting

干预措施: Usual care (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Clinician-surrogate Concordance Scale Score

时间窗: ~2-7 days post-randomization

Concordance is calculated as the absolute value of the difference in prognosis for 1 year patient survival between the surrogate(s) and the clinician (ICU physician), and, therefore, can range from 0 to 100. We report pre-intervention to post-intervention difference in the CSCS. The CSCS is calculated as the absolute value of the difference between the surrogate's response and that of either the treating ICU physician (primary outcome) or the nurse (secondary outcome) to the question, "What percent chance do you think \[the patient/your loved one\] has of being alive 1 year from now if the current treatment plan is continued?" Scores can range from 0 to 100 percentage points, and higher values indicate greater discordance.

次要结局

  • Post-traumatic Stress Syndrome Inventory(Pre-randomization (study day 1) and 180 days post-randomization)
  • Patient-centeredness of Care Scale(Study day 1 and 180 days post-randomization)
  • Quality of Communication Scale Score(Study day 1 (pre-randomization), ~2-7)
  • Medical Comprehension Scale Score(Study day 1 (pre-randomization), ~2-7)
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score(Pre-randomization (study day 1) and 180 days post-randomization)
  • Change in Clinical-surrogate Concordance Scale Score (Nurse)(~2-7 days post-randomization)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (8)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Improving Decision Making for Patients With... | 临床试验