MedPath

Compare the Efficacy of Cinacalcet vs Traditional Vitamin D for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) Among Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary
Interventions
Drug: Traditional Vitamin D Therapy
Registration Number
NCT01181531
Lead Sponsor
Amgen
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of treatment with cinacalcet to manage plasma parathyroid levels as to compared traditional vitamin D therapy, whether given orally or intravenously, among hemodialysis subjects with secondary hyperparathyroidism when the doses are adjusted appropriately to maintain serum calcium and phosphorous levels with currently recommended ranges.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
312
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age ≥ 18 years at screening
  • Treated with maintenance hemodialysis 3 times a week for ≥ 3 months prior to screening
  • Informed consent provided by the study candidate
  • For subjects NOT receiving cinacalcet and/or vitamin D therapy for SHPT within 60 days prior to enrollment: Plasma PTH levels ≥ 450 pg/mL (50 pmol/L) during screening, as obtained from the central laboratory and, Serum corrected total calcium ≥ 8.4 mg/dL (2.1 mmol/L) and < 10.2 mg/dL (2.55 mmol/L) during screening, as obtained from the central laboratory
Exclusion Criteria
  • Parathyroidectomy in the 12 weeks before the date of informed consent
  • History of seizure within 12 weeks prior to randomization
  • Scheduled for kidney transplant
  • Parathyroidectomy anticipated within the next 6 months
  • Liver function tests > than 2 x the Upper Limit of Normal
  • Prior use of bisphosphonates, or expected to receive bisphosphonates during the trial
  • Subject has previously enrolled in this study
  • General
  • Other investigational procedures are excluded
  • Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study(s), or receiving other investigational agent(s)
  • Subject (male or female) is not willing to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for at least one month (women) and 3 months (men) after the end of treatment
  • Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant during study or within 1 month after the end of treatment Male subject with a pregnant partner who is not willing to use a condom during treatment and for at least 1 month after the end of treatment
  • Subject has known sensitivity or intolerance to any of the protocol required therapies
  • Subject will not be available for protocol-required study visits, to the best of the subject and investigator's knowledge
  • Subject has any kind of disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or to comply with all required study procedures

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Traditional Vitamin D TherapyTraditional Vitamin D Therapy-
CinacalcetCinacalcet-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean PTH During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)Baseline to week 40-52

Mean PTH during EAP is defined as the mean of values at study weeks 40, 44, 48 and 52

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Treatment Comparison of >=30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)Baseline to week 40-52

Number of participants achieving a \>=30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)

Treatment Comparison of Plasma PTH < 300 pg/mL During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)week 40-52

Number of participants achieving Plasma PTH \< 300 pg/mL During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath