Percutaneous Pinning Versus Plate and Screws for Surgical Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures
- Conditions
- Proximal Humeral Fractures
- Interventions
- Device: Proximal humeral fracture fixation
- Registration Number
- NCT06354894
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Turin, Italy
- Brief Summary
The aim of this multicenter nonrandomised study is to prospectively compare the clinical and radiographic results of two different techniques of surgical fixation of proximal humeral fractures: percutaneous pinning versus plate and screws.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
- > 18 year old
- proximal humeral fracture
- both X-rays and CT scan available
- dementia
- psychiatric disease
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patients affected by proximal humeral fracture Proximal humeral fracture fixation -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quick Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score 1 year The questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability)
Radiographic outcomes 1 year Shoulder x-rays will be reviewed by a panel of experts in shoulder traumatology who will be asked to define the result as:
* normal
* nonunion
* malunion
* avascular necrosis
* infectionOxford Shoulder Score (OSS) 1 year Patient reported outcome. Score from 0 to 48 points (with the higher score being the better)
Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) 1 year The subjective shoulder value is defined as a patient's subjective shoulder assessment expressed as a percentage of an entirely normal shoulder during ADLs (from 0% to 100%, with the higher score being the better)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital
🇮🇹Orbassano, Turin, Italy