MedPath

Continuous Versus Intermittent Nebulization Therapy in Acute Asthma Exacerbation at Emergency Department

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Asthma Exacerbation
Nebulization
Emergency Department
Registration Number
NCT06291740
Lead Sponsor
Thammasat University
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical is to compare treatment outcomes between continuous nebulization and intermittent therapy in the management of acute exacerbation of asthma in the emergency department(ED). Participants will random assign to either continuous or intermittent nebulization. In the continuous group, patients receive budesonide, fenoterol, ipratropium bromide, and normal saline continuously for an hour. In the intermittent group, the same medications are administer every 20 minutes for an hour. Measurements include symptom severity, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and pulmonary function tests. Primary endpoints are ED stay length, hospital admission, and ED revisit within 48 hours post-discharge. Adverse events are documented.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • asthma exacerbation
Exclusion Criteria
  • life-threatening conditions requiring intubation
  • allergy to steroid or its components
  • patient under investigation of Corona Virus Disease, 2019 (COVID-19)
  • pulmonary tuberculosis
  • unable to cooperate for pulmonary function testing

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Length of ED staythrough study completion, an average of 1 year

duration of ED management

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
pulmonary function testthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Forced Expiratory Volume in one second(FEV1), Peak Expiratory Flow(PEF)

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.