Continuous Versus Intermittent Nebulization Therapy in Acute Asthma Exacerbation at Emergency Department
- Conditions
- Asthma ExacerbationNebulizationEmergency Department
- Registration Number
- NCT06291740
- Lead Sponsor
- Thammasat University
- Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical is to compare treatment outcomes between continuous nebulization and intermittent therapy in the management of acute exacerbation of asthma in the emergency department(ED). Participants will random assign to either continuous or intermittent nebulization. In the continuous group, patients receive budesonide, fenoterol, ipratropium bromide, and normal saline continuously for an hour. In the intermittent group, the same medications are administer every 20 minutes for an hour. Measurements include symptom severity, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and pulmonary function tests. Primary endpoints are ED stay length, hospital admission, and ED revisit within 48 hours post-discharge. Adverse events are documented.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- asthma exacerbation
- life-threatening conditions requiring intubation
- allergy to steroid or its components
- patient under investigation of Corona Virus Disease, 2019 (COVID-19)
- pulmonary tuberculosis
- unable to cooperate for pulmonary function testing
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Length of ED stay through study completion, an average of 1 year duration of ED management
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method pulmonary function test through study completion, an average of 1 year Forced Expiratory Volume in one second(FEV1), Peak Expiratory Flow(PEF)
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.