MedPath

Rim Plate to Buttress Plate for Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures With and Without Inter-fragmentary Screws

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Acetabular Fracture
Interventions
Procedure: pelvic reconstruction
Registration Number
NCT06409559
Lead Sponsor
University of Cincinnati
Brief Summary

The hypothesis of this study is that the Rim Plate method utilizing interfragmentary screws placed through the plate will result in superior fixation, a lower rate of loss of reduction of the fracture fragment, better anatomic healing of the articular (joint) surface, a decreased rate of early post-traumatic arthritic changes of the joint (cartilage) surface, and improved functional outcomes.

Detailed Description

Study type: Interventional Estimated enrollment: 60 Allocation: block randomization. The block randomization method is designed to randomize subjects into groups that result in equal sample sizes. This method is used to ensure a balance in sample size across groups over time.

Interventional model: parallel assignment Description: two different methods of screw and plate fixation of posterior wall acetabulum fractures.

Time perspective: Prospective

Population:

Skeletally mature patients who have presented with an acute traumatic fracture of the posterior wall of acetabulum due to dislocation of the femoral head will be included in this study. All surgeons on the study routinely perform both types of repairs.

Treatment arms and Intervention:

Arm A: Rim plate group - This group will consist of 30 patients where the posterior wall fracture will be operatively stabilized with a pelvic reconstruction plate and interfragmentary screws placed through the plate.

Arm B: Buttress plate group - This group will consist of 30 patients where the posterior wall fracture will be operatively fixed with a buttress plate applied under compression without interfragmentary lag or position screws.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Skeletally mature males and females, ≥ 18 years old and with age less than 65 years.
  2. Fracture of the acetabular posterior wall fracture due to acute traumatic hip dislocation, confirmed with anteroposterior pelvic or hip radiographs, and CT scan
  3. Operative fixation of fractures within 14 days of presenting to the emergency room.
  4. Patient was ambulatory prior to fracture, with or without walking aids
  5. Medically optimized for operative intervention
  6. Provision of informed consent by patient or legal guardian.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patients not suitable for internal fixation (severe osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or pathologic fracture).
  2. Pre-existing orthopedic fixation, implant, or prosthesis around the affected acetabulum.
  3. Patients with metabolic bone disease including diagnosis of osteoporosis.
  4. Patients with bony or soft tissue infections around the acetabulum.
  5. Patients unable to provide informed consent.
  6. Patients having other fractures of Pelvis or acetabulum other than an isolated posterior acetabular wall fracture.
  7. Patients with previous history of acetabular fracture (operative or nonoperative)
  8. Patients with previous history of hip pathology such as avascular necrosis, hip dysplasia, Legg-Calve Perthes Disease, or advanced degenerative arthritis.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Rim plate grouppelvic reconstructionThis group will consist of 30 patients where the posterior wall fracture will be operatively stabilized with a pelvic reconstruction plate and interfragmentary screws placed through the plate.
Buttress plate grouppelvic reconstructionThis group will consist of 30 patients where the posterior wall fracture will be operatively fixed with a buttress plate applied under compression without interfragmentary lag or position screws.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Healing of the posterior wall fragment12 months

Measured on immediate post-op CT and compared to measurement one year post-op

Displacement of posterior wall acetabular fragment12 months

Measured on immediate post-op CT and compared to measurement one year post-op

Articular space loss12 months

Degree and extent of articular space loss (chondrolysis)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
IOWA hip score12 months

Hip rating system

SMFA score12 months

Measure the functional status of patients with a broad range of musculoskeletal injuries and disorders

Modified Merle d'Aubigne score12 months

Evaluates pain, gait and mobility

PROMIS-10 score12 months

A system of highly reliable, precise measures of patient-reported health status for physical, mental, and social well-being

SF 36 score12 months

Quantifies health status and measures health-related quality of life

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

🇺🇸

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath