Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05517187
NCT05517187
Unknown
Not Applicable

Clinical Success of Regenerative Endodontic Treatment With Platelets Rich Fibrin PRF as a Secondary Treatment of Mature Necrotic Incisors With Periapical Radiolucency in Adolescents: A Preliminary Parallel Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Nahda University2 sites in 1 country40 target enrollmentMarch 10, 2022

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Dental Pulp Necroses
Sponsor
Nahda University
Enrollment
40
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Clinical success
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Evalaution of clinical success of secondary treatment for total 40 permanent incisors with failed root canal treatment with apical radiolucency.

Twenty of of these permanent incisors will be treated with regenerative endodontic treatment(RET) with platelets rich fibrin PRF as intervention group vs. 20 incisors control group secondary treated with (RET) with induced blood clot (BC).

Detailed Description

A preliminary randomized parallel controlled trial will be conducted. Forty teeth of 36 patients were randomly assigned into two groups: group "PRF", treated with RET with PRF platelets rich fibrin (intervention), and group "BC", treated with RET with induced blood clot(control). Upon clinical examination, the presence of pain on biting or percussion, swelling or sinus tract, or abnormal tooth mobility will be considered a failure. To monitor the changes in periapical radiolucency, a periapical index (PAI) will be used. The primary outcome of the current study will be to assess the effectiveness of RET using PRF platelets rich fibrin of mature permanent incisors with periapical radiolucency compared to RET using induced BC formation in the root canal space. Eligibility criteria: Healthy adolescents below the age of 18 years who need endodontic retreatment of previously obturated mature single-rooted incisors with gutta-percha will be recruited. Patients with a positive history of allergic reactions, systemic diseases, and severe emotional or behavioral problems will be precluded. Only teeth diagnosed with asymptomatic apical periodontitis or chronic apical abscess (i.e. little discomfort with intermittent episodes of pus discharge through the sinus tract) were included. To confirm the clinical status, only teeth with a periapical index (PAI) score ≥3 based on Ørstavik et al classification were considered. Teeth with previous attempts for endodontic retreatment including pulpotomy or pulpectomy, non-restorable crowns or need post placement, or periodontal problems were excluded. A tooth must not be a candidate for endodontic surgery according to Glickman et al. indications and the updates of the European Society of Endodontology (e.g. obtaining biopsy, removal of intracanal broken files, persistent periapical lesions standing for a long period, radicular perforation, root fracture, or obstructed root canals, or the inability of complete removal of old gutta-percha or extruded material beyond the apex with persistent apical lesion for long duration). Interventions: According to the latest RET operating guidelines issued by the American Academy of Endodontics (AAE) and the European Society of Endodontics (ESE), the standardised operating procedure of RET requires two treatment visits. During the first appointment, infection is controlled and inflammation is relieved with complete removal of failed obturation material. Pulp regeneration and revascularization is accomplished during the second appointment.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 10, 2022
End Date
March 1, 2023
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Yassmine mohamed farouk el makawi

Lecturer in pediatric dentistry(clinical investigator)

Nahda University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Healthy patients below age of 18 years.
  • Need endodontic retreatment of previously obturated closed apexes single-rooted incisors with gutta-percha.
  • No previous attempts for endodontic retreatment.
  • Presence of clinical signs and symptoms of chronic apical periodontitis

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with a positive history of allergic reactions, systemic diseases, and severe emotional or behavioral problems were precluded.
  • Teeth with previous attempts for endodontic retreatment including pulpotomy or pulpectomy, non-restorable crowns

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Clinical success

Time Frame: 12 months

Clinical assessment will be performed at the baseline (T0) and after 12 months (T1). Upon examination, clinical failure will be encountered if one of the following features will present: (i) pain on biting or percussion, (ii) swelling or sinus tract, or (iii) abnormal tooth mobility.

Radiographic success

Time Frame: 12 months

For a standardized appraisal of the changes in the size of periapical radiolucency, long cone "paralleling technique" with a receptor holder was used after mounting a size II periapical film (Kodak International) to a silicone bite stent.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pulp sensibility test(12 months)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials