The Effect of Home-based Rehabilitation Program After COVID-19 Infection
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Home-based rehabilitation aloneBehavioral: Add-on telerehabilitation and home-based rehabilitation
- Registration Number
- NCT05317975
- Lead Sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Brief Summary
To follow up the cardiopulmonary function after coronavirus disease 2019 (CoVID-19) infection and compare the effect of a 12-week home-based cardiopulmonary with or without add-on remote rehabilitation on the cardiopulmonary function, emotion and quality of outcome.
- Detailed Description
The investigators will recruit the patients post-CoVID infection for a cardiopulmonary function evaluation and a home-based rehabilitation program. The investigators hypothesize that an add-on remote rehabilitation on a home-based rehabilitation has a better effect than a home-based rehabilitation alone on the compliance rate for the exercise, and also a better outcome in terms of cardiopulmonary function testing, 6-minute walking test, physical activities and quality of life, as well as less dyspnea, depression and anxiety.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 225
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Stand-alone usual home-based rehabilitation Home-based rehabilitation alone Stand-alone usual home-based rehabilitation Add-on telerehabilitation combined with usual home-based rehabilitation Add-on telerehabilitation and home-based rehabilitation Add-on telerehabilitation combined with usual home-based rehabilitation
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change of 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and exercise capacity The change in 6MWT and peak oxygen uptake will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention. The distance of a 6-minute walking test and peak oxygen uptake according to cardiopulmonary exercise test will be assessed before intervention (12-week rehabilitation course), 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Fatigue The change in BFI will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention. The investigators will assess the change in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). The total score of BFI ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater level of fatigue.
Cognitive evaluation The change in MoCA will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention. The investigators will assess the change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The total score of MoCA ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.
Dyspnea scale The change in mMRC will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention. The investigators will assess the change in the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale. The mMRC scale ranges from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate worsen symptoms.
Depression and anxiety The change in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention. The investigators will assess the change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7). The PHQ-9 score ranges from 0-27 and the GAD-7 score ranges 0-21. Higher scores indicate worsen symptoms.
Quality of life evaluation The change in EQ-5D will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention. The investigators will assess the change in EuroQol-5D.
Grip strength The change in grip strength will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention. The investigators will assess the grip strength using a grip goniometer with the participants seated and the elbow flexed at 90 degree.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan