MedPath

The Effect of Home-based Rehabilitation Program After COVID-19 Infection

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
COVID-19
Interventions
Behavioral: Home-based rehabilitation alone
Behavioral: Add-on telerehabilitation and home-based rehabilitation
Registration Number
NCT05317975
Lead Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Brief Summary

To follow up the cardiopulmonary function after coronavirus disease 2019 (CoVID-19) infection and compare the effect of a 12-week home-based cardiopulmonary with or without add-on remote rehabilitation on the cardiopulmonary function, emotion and quality of outcome.

Detailed Description

The investigators will recruit the patients post-CoVID infection for a cardiopulmonary function evaluation and a home-based rehabilitation program. The investigators hypothesize that an add-on remote rehabilitation on a home-based rehabilitation has a better effect than a home-based rehabilitation alone on the compliance rate for the exercise, and also a better outcome in terms of cardiopulmonary function testing, 6-minute walking test, physical activities and quality of life, as well as less dyspnea, depression and anxiety.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
225
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Stand-alone usual home-based rehabilitationHome-based rehabilitation aloneStand-alone usual home-based rehabilitation
Add-on telerehabilitation combined with usual home-based rehabilitationAdd-on telerehabilitation and home-based rehabilitationAdd-on telerehabilitation combined with usual home-based rehabilitation
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change of 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and exercise capacityThe change in 6MWT and peak oxygen uptake will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.

The distance of a 6-minute walking test and peak oxygen uptake according to cardiopulmonary exercise test will be assessed before intervention (12-week rehabilitation course), 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
FatigueThe change in BFI will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.

The investigators will assess the change in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). The total score of BFI ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater level of fatigue.

Cognitive evaluationThe change in MoCA will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.

The investigators will assess the change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The total score of MoCA ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.

Dyspnea scaleThe change in mMRC will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.

The investigators will assess the change in the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale. The mMRC scale ranges from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate worsen symptoms.

Depression and anxietyThe change in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.

The investigators will assess the change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7). The PHQ-9 score ranges from 0-27 and the GAD-7 score ranges 0-21. Higher scores indicate worsen symptoms.

Quality of life evaluationThe change in EQ-5D will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.

The investigators will assess the change in EuroQol-5D.

Grip strengthThe change in grip strength will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.

The investigators will assess the grip strength using a grip goniometer with the participants seated and the elbow flexed at 90 degree.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National Taiwan University Hospital

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath