跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01836588
NCT01836588Unknown不适用

New Gentle Biopsy Method of Cervix Lesions Using Superficial Curettage/Protocol ID: CX-CUR

Charite University, Berlin, Germany1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2013年3月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
300
试验地点
1
主要终点
pathological comparative results and all cause mobidity

研究概览

简要总结

It is to investigate to what extent a gentle tissue extraction of CIN lesions of the cervix will bring the same conclusion than the conventional cervix biopsy, but with less pain and morbidity, after patients were undergoing a conisation in order to treat CIN.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Women between 18 and 80
  • •Karnofsky-Index of 80 and higher
  • •Cytological suspicious CIN and a colposcopical impression of a major lesion (therapeutical endpoint: conisation)

排除标准

  • •Former malign disease oft he pelvic organs
  • •Pregnancy
  • •Serious internistic diseases
  • •Drug addiction

研究组 & 干预措施

gentle tissue extraction (curettage)

Active Comparator

Object of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure.

For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.

干预措施: conventional cervix biopsy (Procedure)

conventional cervix biopsy

Active Comparator

Object of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure.

For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.

干预措施: conventional cervix biopsy (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

pathological comparative results and all cause mobidity

时间窗: 1 year

The comparison of these two methods to show that the pathologic diagnostical results are alike and the morbidity is less.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Tim Schellenberg

physician

Charite University, Berlin, Germany

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验