Clinical Study to Compare Cold Snare Underwater Polypectomy to Cold Snare Conventional Polypectomy for Colon Polyps [COLDWATER Study]
- Conditions
- Colon PolypsPolypectomy
- Interventions
- Procedure: Conventional Cold Snare PolypectomyProcedure: Underwater Cold Snare Polypectomy
- Registration Number
- NCT05273697
- Lead Sponsor
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
- Brief Summary
Colon cancer is internationally the third cause of deaths from a malignant disease. Screening colonoscopy in adults \>45 years of age aims at the early diagnosis and treatment colon polyps that are precancerous lesions. Endoscopic polyp removal (polypectomy) can be done with various techniques depending on the size, morphology, location of the polyp etc. According to updated guidelines, non-pedunculated polyps of small size are treated with a cold snare in air dilated intestinal lumen (conventional cold snare polypectomy - CCSP).In recent years, several studies have described the benefits of water aided colonoscopy, as well as safety and efficacy of underwater polypectomy in large colon polyps. However, there is not enough data on small polyps which are the most commonly diagnosed.This is a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of CCSP to underwater cold snare polypectomy (UCSP)for non-pedunculated polyps of size of 5-10 mm. A total of 398 polyps will be randomized and randomization will be performed via random numbers method of Microsoft Excel 2016. Primary outcome of this study is to determine muscularis mucosa resection rate. Secondary outcomes are the depth and percentage of R0 excisions and possible complications.
The investigators expect UCSP to ensure a higher muscularis mucosa resection rate and they attempt to examine the resection depth in the submucosal layer.These results will provide useful data for the development of guidelines in polypectomy techniques for non-pedunculated polyps 5-10mm.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 396
- Age > 20years
- Non pedunculated polyps (Paris classification Isp, Is, IIa, IIb)
- Polyp size: diameter of 5 to 10mm
- Endoscopic diagnosis of mucosal lesions - must not present malignant submucosal infiltration evidence like deepening, ulceration / ulcer, abnormal vessels, irregular surface, (NICE 1, NICE 2A, BASIC)
- Informed consent
- Patients who receive antiplatelet / anticoagulant therapy are included in the study only if their therapy has been modified according to ESGE guidelines
- Age <20 years old
- Pedunculated polyps
- Lesions with macroscopic elements of high-grade dysplasia or submucosal infiltration
- Sites with previous polypectomy
- Patients with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease
- Patients with coagulation disorders
- Patients with severe organ failure
7.Patients who during endoscopy will undergo any technique using electrocautery / electrocoagulation will not be eligible for participation in the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Conventional cold snare polypectomy group Conventional Cold Snare Polypectomy Cold snare polypectomy in colon lumen dilated with air Underwater cold snare polypectomy group Underwater Cold Snare Polypectomy Cold snare polypectomy after complete immersion of the polyp in the water
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method percentage of muscularis mucosa included in specimen (%) through study completion, an average of 1 year Determination of percentage of muscularis mucosa included in specimen. The determination of the percentage of the area containing muscularis mucosa layer will be done by measuring the length of muscularis mucosa mm / length of specimen mm x100%. Using an ocular and stage micrometer, the length of the muscularis mucosa underlining a neoplastic lesion was measured, along with the specimen's maximum diameter (mm)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of R0 Resections through study completion, an average of 1 year Vial 1 : Determination of polypectomy margin according to Residual Tumor Classification Vial 1A : Determination of horizontal margins: presence of residual damage or not In order to determine the horizontal margins, 2-4 biopsies will be taken from the resection area (2 biopsies antidiametrically in polyps of 5-7 mm size, 4 biopsies in polyps of 8-10 mm size). One cup of forceps will be placed in the defect and the second in the macroscopically normal mucosa.
The received tissue pieces will be placed in a new vial with formol (Vial 1A)
A microscopically margin-negative resection will be characterized as "R0 resection" The determination of R0 Resection Rate will be done by measuring the number of R0 resections / number of all the resections regardless R classificationComplication rate 30 days after the polypectomy (treatment procedure) intraprocedural bleeding, post-procedural bleeding, perforation, abdominal pain not due to perforation. These complications will be evaluated by a study physician of the Gastroenterology Department with a phone call and clinical examination if needed
Presence or absence of submucosal in the specimen and its depth (if present) through study completion, an average of 1 year Presence or absence of submucosa
- Measurement of submucosa depth in μm (when submucosa is present in the specimen)Recurrence lesion rate during repeat colonoscopy in 6-12months 6-12 months after polypectomy (treatment procedure) A subgroup of the sample size will undergo a follow up colonoscopy in 6-12 months in order to identify lesion recurrence
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Sismanogleio General Hospital
🇬🇷Athens, Greece