Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01311284
NCT01311284
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of Airtraq Nasotracheal Mcgrath and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Nasotracheal Intubation: A Manikin Study

Manuel Ángel Gómez-Ríos1 site in 1 country63 target enrollmentMarch 2011

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Nasotracheal Intubation
Sponsor
Manuel Ángel Gómez-Ríos
Enrollment
63
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Time in seconds required for a successful intubation attempt with the Macintosh laryngoscope, Airtraq NT and Mcgrath.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
14 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Nasotracheal intubation is usually required in oral surgery to allow an unrestricted surgical approach. The standard method is generally performed using the Macintosh laryngoscope supported by Magill forceps. However, it is recommended to perform awake tracheal intubation in situations where a difficult airway is predicted, a scenario where this technique may be poorly tolerated by the patient. Although fibreoptic intubation is considered the "gold standard", sometimes it is difficult to perform and,therefore, alternatives are necessary. The hypothesis is that optical laryngoscopes as the Airtraq nasotracheal and Mcgrath can improve the time and/or success of nasotracheal intubation in a manikin.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2011
End Date
December 2011
Last Updated
14 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Manuel Ángel Gómez-Ríos
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Manuel Ángel Gómez-Ríos

MD

Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Be Component of service of anesthesiology C.H.U. A Coruña
  • Give voluntary consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not meet the above criteria

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time in seconds required for a successful intubation attempt with the Macintosh laryngoscope, Airtraq NT and Mcgrath.

Time Frame: Two months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of operators needed(Two months)
  • Satisfaction of the operators(Two months)
  • Intubation time(Two months)
  • Number of intubation attempts.(Two months)
  • The success rate of placement of the endotracheal tube (ETT) in the trachea(Two months)
  • The duration of the first intubation attempt (whether successful or not)(Two months)
  • Cormack and Lehane Grade(Two months)
  • Time visualization of the glottis(Two months)
  • Severity of dental trauma(Two months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials