Comparison of the Frequency-altering AKE-1 Capsule and Pillcam SB2
- Conditions
- Gastrointestinal HemorrhageIntestinal Diseases
- Registration Number
- NCT01872286
- Lead Sponsor
- Changhai Hospital
- Brief Summary
Capsule endoscopy has been shown to be the first-line endoscopic procedure for small bowel disease. This study was aimed to compare the performance between the frequency-altering AKE-1 capsule and the Pillcam SB2 in patients with suspected small bowel disease.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 53
- obscure gastrointestinal bleeding
- chronic diarrhea
- suspected Crohn's disease
- chronic abdominal pain
- neoplastic lesions of small bowel
- patients with any contraindication to capsule endoscopy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method judgement of normal or abnormal of gastrointestinal tract 5 weeks after the examination If a lesion is detected by capsule endoscopy in gastrointestinal tract in a patient, the result will be judged as abnormal.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method diagnostic yield 5 weeks after the examination The finding that could explain the symptom and resulted in clinical impact was considered as diagnosis.Diagnostic yield of a capsule endoscopy is the proportion of patients with positive diagnosis over total patients.
small-bowel transit time the comparison was completed 5 weeks after the examination total number of images captured the comparison was completed 5 weeks after the examination complete small-bowel examination rate 5 weeks after the examination total recording time 5 weeks after the examination gastric transit time the comparison was completed 5 weeks after the examination
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Wuhan Union Hospital
🇨🇳Wuhan, Hubei, China
Shanghai Changhai Hospital
🇨🇳Shanghai, Shanghai, China
Wuhan Union Hospital🇨🇳Wuhan, Hubei, China