Comparison of the Outcomes and Complications of Two transection techniques (Crush-Clamp versus Ultrasonic Dissection) for Hepatic resectio
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Hepatic failure.Hepatic failure, not elsewhere classified
- Registration Number
- IRCT20191016045130N1
- Lead Sponsor
- Vice-Chancellor in Research Affairs, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Inclusion Criteria
Patients who are supposed to be hepatectomy
Exclusion Criteria
Patient dissatisfaction
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Operation time. Timepoint: In operation. Method of measurement: By watch.;Hepatectomy time. Timepoint: In operation. Method of measurement: By watch.;Bleeding rate. Timepoint: In operation. Method of measurement: By measuring the suction.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ABG changes. Timepoint: During and after surgery. Method of measurement: Laboratory test.;Urine output. Timepoint: During and after surgery. Method of measurement: By checking the urine bag.;Liver enzymes profile. Timepoint: 2, 3 and 5 day after surgery. Method of measurement: Laboratory test.;Patient INR. Timepoint: 1, 2, 3 and 4 day after surgery. Method of measurement: Laboratory test.