Comparative Study Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion(PLF) and Intertransverse Process Fusion in Treatment of Spodylolithesis
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Assiut University
- Enrollment
- 30
- Primary Endpoint
- Back pain
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The first technique described for interbody fusion was the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).(20) For this technique, the intervertebral disc is accessed through a retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach.
While the posterior approach was first described by Russell Hibbs in 1911, in the 1950's, Cloward (7)popularized the posterior approach for a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).
Detailed Description
In this study we will try to identify the benefits and outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and inter transverse process bone graft fusion.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Single Group
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •lumbar spondylolisthesis
Exclusion Criteria
- •infection of lumbar spine
Arms & Interventions
Lumbar spondylolisthesis 2
Intervention: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (Procedure)
Lumbar spondylolisthesis1
Intervention: Inter transverse bone grafting (Procedure)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Back pain
Time Frame: 1year postoperative
Back pain severity grading mild, moderate, severe
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Mahmoud Garamoun Abd El Zaher
Doctor
Assiut University