Imaging for Prostate Cancer Metastasis Detection - Traditional Imaging (Bone Scan and CT) Versus PSMA-PET-CT, SPECT-CT and Whole-Body MRI
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-PSMA-1007-PET/CT (PSMA-PET/CT) to 99mTc-HMDP planar bone scintigraphy (planar BS) in pessimistic, patient-based analysis detecting of bone metastases in the initial staging of high-risk PC patients.
研究概览
简要总结
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer among men and one quarter of diagnosed PC are metastatic at the time of diagnosis. Accurate staging is paramount as the stage is the most important factor when treatment decisions are made. The stage is also the single most important prognostic factor. Currently, traditional imaging methods for detection of PC metastasis, including bone scan (BS) and contrast enhanced whole-body computer tomography (CT), are rather inaccurate. Respectively, novel imaging techniques are evolving and novel imaging modalities are emerging in PC diagnostics and staging, but their clinical relevance is unclear and lacking prospective studies comparing traditional imaging with novel imaging.
This prospective single-institutional study compares the diagnostic accuracy of novel imaging modalities to traditional imaging modalities aiming to find the most appropriate staging modality in high-risk PC at the time of initial staging.
详细描述
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer among men. The incidence of PC has increased dramatically in Finland since 1980´s and lately approximately 4.500 new PC cases have been diagnosed annually in Finland.
About one quarter of diagnosed PC are metastatic at the time of diagnosis. Accurate staging is extremely important, as the stage is single most important factor when treatment decisions are made and stage is the single most important prognostic factor. Localized PC is treated with active surveillance (low risk cases), or with treatment modalities with curative intent (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy).Although recently radical treatments have been suggested to play a role in low volume metastatic disease, the standard treatment of metastatic disease is castration therapy.
In PC staging the most important anatomic locations to be imaged are i) bone, ii) lymph nodes (especially pelvic lymph nodes), and iii) extranodal soft tissues.
Detection of tumor bone metastases is commonly performed by BS. However, the results of recent studies have raised many doubts whether BS is as effective for confirming or excluding metastatic bone disease. Moreover, the sensitivity for 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy (99mTc-MDP BS) is only 50-70%. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk PC is significantly improved by SPECT compared to planar BS. Other imaging modalities with potentially improved accuracy to detect bone metastases in PC include PET-scan and whole body MRI.
The value of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging depends on the suitability of used isotope tracer to identify lesions of the imaged tumor type. When bone is imaged with PET, 18F-fluoride has been the most commonly used tracer. Other commonly used PET tracers in PC include 18F-FDG, and 18F/11C-choline, but both have been late more or less replaced by PSMA-PET. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a trans-membrane protein with an increased expression on cell membranes of PC cells. 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC (Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys- (Ahx)-[68Ga(HBED-CC)]) was designed as an extracellular PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging and has been shown to demonstrate high specificity for PSMA-expressing tumor cell. PSMA-PET results have been reported in several studies, but only in three prospective, one including 20-30 patients. Of those studies only study by Fendler and coworkers investigated overall staging, the other two studies by van Leeuwen focused on intraprostatic tumor detection or nodal metastases. Nevertheless, PSMA-PET/CT is a promising imaging modality both for soft tissues and bone. Recently 68Ga-PSMA was reported to outperform 99mTc-DPD-SPECT in detection of bone metastases in PC.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- None
盲法说明
Imaging modalities will be read blindly without the knowledge of results of the other imaging modalities. Readers will only know that a patient has prostate cancer with high risk for metastases. All imaging data will be analyzed visually with classifying lesions as normal, equivocal or metastatic.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- Male
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Histologically confirmed PC without previous PC treatment
- •High-risk PC defined with one or more of the following criteria: Gleason ≥4+3, PSA ≥20, cT≥3a
- •Adequate physical status defined (by treating clinician) as capability to undergo some form of active treatment for the PC and the physical status allowing the patient to undergo all study imaging modalities
- •Signed informed consent
排除标准
- •Previous PC treatment. Short-term androgen deprivation therapy is permitted if necessary for symptomatic and/or very high-risk PC patients
- •Contraindications for MRI (cardiac pacemaker, intracranial clips etc.)
- •Claustrophobia
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-PSMA-1007-PET/CT (PSMA-PET/CT) to 99mTc-HMDP planar bone scintigraphy (planar BS) in pessimistic, patient-based analysis detecting of bone metastases in the initial staging of high-risk PC patients.
时间窗: 1 year
Comparison of area under curve (AUC) values in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of PSMA-PET/CT to planar BS in pessimistic, patient-based analysis detecting of bone metastases. The power calculations are made on the basis of previously published work, the SKELETA trial. To be able to detect the 0,19 difference (in AUC values) using a two-tailed test with a power of 80% at a significance level of 0.05 in a 2:1 ratio of sample sizes in negative/positive groups, 48 negative cases and 24 positive cases are required. Equivocal findings of the imaging modalities will be classified either as suggestive for metastases (pessimistic analysis) or suggestive for non-metastatic origin (optimistic analysis). AUC values will be calculated using the trapezoid rule and compared using a method described by Hanley and McNeil, two-sided p-values will be calculated.
次要结局
- The effect of staging on clinical treatment-decisions(1 year)
- AUC values from receiver operating characteristic curve of each imaging modality will be measured in initial staging of nodal, soft tissue and bone metastasis(1 year)
- Sensitivity of each imaging modality will be measured in initial staging of nodal, soft tissue and bone metastasis(1 year)
- Specificity of each imaging modality will be measured in initial staging of nodal, soft tissue and bone metastasis(1 year)
- Diagnostic accuracy each imaging modality will be measured in initial staging of nodal, soft tissue and bone metastasis(1 year)
