Effects of Cognicise and Arch Support Insoles on Lower-extremity Function in Community-dwelling Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Mild Cognitive Impairment
- Sponsor
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
- Enrollment
- 40
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change of static standing balance
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study aims to explore the surplus effect of arch support insole to a cognicise training program on lower-extremity function in community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In this randomized controlled intervention study, we will recruit 40 community-dwelling individuals aged ≥55 years with MCI. Experimental group (n=20) will receive cognicise training program with insole intervention (6 hours/day), while the control group (n=20) only undergo cognicise training. A 1-h training session will be given three times a week for 12 weeks for both groups. The outcomes include static standing balance, functional reach test, timed-up-and-go test, 10-m obstacle crossing, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and gait assessment during single- and dual-task walking for 20 m at self-selected comfortable pace while performing serial subtractions (cognitive interference) or carrying a tray (motor interference). The results of the current study are expected to provide evidences in supporting the use of arch support insole among community-dwelling older adults with MCI. Interventions combing physical-cognitive training and insole for providing mechanical stability and somatosensory stimulation may serve as potential strategies for fall prevention.
Investigators
CY Song
Associate professor
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •(1) aged 55 years and over; (2) able to walk more than 20 m without walking aids; (3) had a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score lower than 26 ; (4) had self-reported memory complaints; and (5) had the ability to perform ADLs.
Exclusion Criteria
- •(1) dementia; (2) a history of malignant tumors ; (3) the presence of an unstable neurological or orthopedic disease, or visual problems interfering with participation in the study; and (4) an education level less than 6 years (elementary school).
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change of static standing balance
Time Frame: at baseline and after 12-wk of intervention
30-s static standing balance
Change of functional reach test
Time Frame: at baseline and after 12-wk of intervention
functional reach test
Change of Short Physical Performance Battery
Time Frame: at baseline and after 12-wk of intervention
Short Physical Performance Battery
Change of timed-up-and-go test
Time Frame: at baseline and after 12-wk of intervention
3-m timed-up-and-go test
Change of gait
Time Frame: at baseline and after 12-wk of intervention
single- and dual-task walking for 20 m at self-selected comfortable pace while performing serial subtractions (cognitive interference) or carrying a tray (motor interference)
Change of 10-m obstacle crossing
Time Frame: at baseline and after 12-wk of intervention
10-m obstacle crossing