Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04788706
NCT04788706CompletedNot Applicable

Efficacy of Low-level Laser Therapy Associated With Russian Electrical Stimulation in Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Controlled Double-blind Study

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital1 site in 1 country80 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
80
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Pain intensity

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Objectives: To investigate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) application combined with Russian Electrical Stimulation on pain, mobility, functionality, range of motion, muscular strength, and activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Design: Randomized controlled double-blind study. Setting: Specialist Rehabilitation Services.

Detailed Description

ABSTRACT Objectives: To investigate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) application combined with Russian Electrical Stimulation on pain, mobility, functionality, range of motion, muscular strength, and activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Design: Randomized controlled double-blind study. Setting: Specialist Rehabilitation Services. Participants: Eighty participants with knee osteoarthritis were randomized. Intervention: Participants were randomized into four groups: Group I (n=20; LLLT over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving Russian electrical stimulation), Group II (n=20; Placebo laser over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving Russian electrical stimulation), Group III (n=20; LLLT over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving LLLT application combined with Russian electrical stimulation), Group IV (n=20; Placebo laser over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving Placebo laser application combined with Russian electrical stimulation). The groups treated with LLLT received treatments with invisible infrared laser (904 nm, 3 Joules/point). The Placebo groups received identical treatment, but the infrared laser output was disabled. The sessions occurred three times a week.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the change in knee pain and functionality (Lequesne). Secondary outcomes included change in mobility (8 meters and Timed Up and Go test), range of motion (goniometer), muscular strength (dynamometer), activity (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis questionnaire) and medication intake.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
50 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •levels 2-4 according to Kellgren-Lawrence grade
  • •aged 50-75 years
  • •both genders
  • •have knee pain and functional disability for at least three months
  • •according to the criteria of the American College for Rheumatology.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •cancer, diabetes, symptomatic hip osteoarthritis, or used antidepressants, anti-inflammatory medications or anxiolytics during six months prior to enrolment.

Arms & Interventions

Group I

Active Comparator

LLLT over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving Russian electrical stimulation

Intervention: Low level Laser Therapy and Russian electrical stimulation (Other)

Group II

Placebo Comparator

Placebo laser over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving Russian electrical stimulation

Intervention: Placebo Laser and Russian electrical stimulation (Other)

Group III

Active Comparator

LLLT over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving LLLT application combined with Russian electrical stimulation

Intervention: Low level Laser Therapy and Low level Laser Therapy plus Russian electrical stimulation (Other)

Group IV

Placebo Comparator

Placebo laser over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving Placebo laser application combined with Russian electrical stimulation

Intervention: Placebo Laser and Placebo Laser plus Russian electrical stimulation (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain intensity

Time Frame: 6 months from baseline (follow up)

numeric pain rating scale (0-10) with a minimal clinically important change of two points

Functionality

Time Frame: 6 months from baseline (follow up)

Was measured using the Lequesne questionnaire (11 questions about pain, discomfort and function). Scores range from 0 to 24 (from 'no' to 'extremely severe' dysfunction).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Medication intake(6 months from baseline (follow up))
  • Range of motion of the knees(6 months from baseline (follow up))
  • Mobility and balance(6 months from baseline (follow up))
  • Activity(6 months from baseline (follow up))
  • Muscular strength(6 months from baseline (follow up))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials