Physiological Effects of a New Interface on Lung Ventilation and Gas Distribution

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Acute Respiratory Failure

• Registration Number: NCT04619641
• Lead Sponsor: University Magna Graecia

Brief Summary

Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure (hARF) is a common reason of admission to Intensive Care. Different modalities can be used to administer oxygen, which is the first supportive treatment in these patients. Recently a new device combining high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been developed, but a few is known in these patients.

Investigators have designed this pilot physiologic randomized cross-over study to assess, in patients with hARF, the effects of a new device combining high-flow oxygen through nasal cannula (HFNC) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on lung aeration and ventilation distribution .

Detailed Description

Around 30% of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are affected by hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure (hARF). The primary supportive treatment in hypoxemic patients is oxygen therapy, which is commonly delivered through nasal prongs or masks. New devices, able to deliver high-flow gas through a nasal cannula (HFNC), have been recently made available. HFNC delivers heated and humidified gas up to 60 L/min, with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ranging from 0.21 to 1, via a wide bore soft nasal prong. Warming and humidification of the inspired gas prevent the adverse effects of cool dry gases on the airway epithelium and facilitate expectoration. HFNC also washes out exhaled carbon dioxide (CO2) from the pharyngeal dead space. HFNC has been shown an effective means to deliver oxygen therapy in many clinical conditions.

In healthy subject during spontaneous unassisted breathing, end-expiratory pharyngeal pressure is about 0.3 and 0.8 cmH2O, with open and closed mouth, respectively. Compared to unassisted spontaneous breathing, HFNC generates greater pharyngeal pressure during expiration, while in the course of inspiration it drops to zero, which limits the effectiveness of HFNC in patients with lung edema and/or collapse. By recruiting lung atelectatic regions, reducing venous admixture and decreasing the inspiratory effort, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is likely more effective in these instances. Compared to noninvasive ventilation by application of an inspiratory pressure support, CPAP offers several advantages, which include ease of use and lack of patient-ventilator asynchrony.

CPAP may be applied either through mask or helmet. This latter is better tolerated than facial masks and allows more prolonged continuous CPAP application. When applying CPAP by helmet, however, heating and humidification of the inhaled gas is problematic because of condensation of water inside the interface, so called "fog effect". Moreover, in patients receiving CPAP by helmet some re-breathing occurs.

To overcome these limitations and combine the beneficial effects of HFNC and CPAP, investigators designed a new device combining HFNC and helmet CPAP.

Recently, it has been found this combination capable to provide a stable CPAP and effective CO2 washout from the upper airways with negligible CO2 re-breathing. Nonetheless, because of the complex interplay between CPAP and HFNC, the amount of truly applied airway pressure, diaphragm function and temperature inside the helmet might be affected to some extent. In 14 adult healthy volunteers, we found that adding HFNC to CPAP (as referenced to CPAP), 1) did not importantly alter either the pre-set airway pressure during inspiration or temperature inside the helmet; 2) increased expiratory airway pressure proportionally to the flow administered by HFNC, but to a lower extent than HFNC alone (as referenced to spontaneous breathing); 3) determined only slight modifications of the respiratory drive (as assessed through diaphragm ultrasound), compared to CPAP alone, 4) did not cause "fog effect" inside the helmet and 5) did not worsen comfort. We therefore suggested that adding heated humidified air through nasal cannula at a flow of 30 L/min during CPAP would probably be the best setting to be applied in patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure.

Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive bedside monitoring device aimed at assessing lung aeration and ventilation. HFNC and CPAP devices was shown to modify lung aeration and ventilation in patients with hARF. However, nothing is known about the effect of the combination of HFNC+CPAP on lung ventilation in patients with hARF. Investigators have therefore designed this pilot physiologic randomized cross-over study to investigate the effects of HFNC+CPAP on lung aeration and ventilation distribution, gas exchange and patient's comfort.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2020-11
• Study First Submitted: 2020-11-02
• Study First Submitted QC: 2020-11-05
• Study First Posted: 2020-11-06
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-11-12
• Last Update Posted: 2020-11-16
• Study Start: 2020-12-01
• Primary Completion: 2021-12-31
• Study Completion: 2021-12-31

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 15

Inclusion Criteria

• presence of hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure
• absence of history of chronic respiratory failure or moderate-to-severe cardiac insufficiency

Exclusion Criteria

• reduced level of consciousness, as indicated by a Glasgow Coma Scale < 12
• severe respiratory distress (i.e. respiratory rate > 35 breaths/min)
• hemodynamic instability, (i.e. systolic arterial pressure <90 mmHg or mean systolic pressure <65 mmHg despite fluid repletion)
• need for vasoactive agents, i.e. vasopressin or epinephrine at any dosage, or norepinephrine >0.3 mcg/kg/min or dobutamine>5 mcg/kg/min
• life-threatening arrhythmias or electrocardiographic signs of ischemia
• acute respiratory failure secondary to neurological disorders, status asthmaticus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiogenic pulmonary oedema
• presence of tracheotomy
• uncontrolled vomiting
• more than 2 acute organ failures
• body mass index >30 kg/m2
• documented history or suspicion of obstructive sleep apnoea
• facial anatomy contraindicating helmet or nasal cannula application
• contraindications to placement of EIT (i.e., pneumothorax, pulmonary emphysema, chest burns or thoracic surgery within 1 week)
• inclusion in other research protocols.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: CROSSOVER

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change of end-expiratory lung impedance (dEELI) from HFNC	After 30 minutes of treatment application	change from HFNC, expressed in percentage of the tidal volume, of the end expiratory lung volume as assessed through electrical impedance tomography

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)	After 30 minutes of treatment application	Analysis of arterial blood gases
Patient's comfort	After 30 minutes of treatment application	It will be measured using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale. Briefly, after detailed explanation before initiating the protocol, patients will be asked to indicate a number between 0 (worst possible comfort) and 10 (no discomfort) on an adapted printed scale.
Global Inhomogeneity (GI)	After 30 minutes of treatment application	inhomogeneity of air distribution within the lung as assessed through electrical impedance tomography
Change of tidal volume in percentage (dVt%) from HFNC	After 30 minutes of treatment application	change from HFNC, expressed in percentage, of the tidal volume as assessed through electrical impedance tomography
Patient's Dyspnea	After 30 minutes of treatment application	It will be measured using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale. Briefly, after detailed explanation before initiating the protocol, patients will be asked to indicate a number between 0 (no dyspnoea) and 10 (worst possible dyspnoea) on an adapted printed scale.
Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)	After 30 minutes of treatment application	Analysis of arterial blood gases