MedPath

Testing a Novel Parenting Intervention for Children With Autism

Not Applicable
Conditions
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Interventions
Behavioral: Elaborative Reminiscence (ER)
Behavioral: Present Tense Talk (PTT)
Registration Number
NCT04574206
Lead Sponsor
City, University of London
Brief Summary

This study will investigate the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of training parents to use a structured communication intervention that is aimed towards helping children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

This intervention has demonstrated benefits for non-autistic children in known areas of difficulty found with autistic individuals. There are currently few evidence-based interventions for school-aged children with ASD who have no other language or intellectual disabilities and are educated in mainstream schools. We will evaluate the benefits of training parents to use a freely available communication technique designed to tackle underlying psychological processes crucial to later development.

Detailed Description

Over recent years a growing body of research has reported significant, beneficial effects of using an "elaborative reminiscence" (ER) intervention on a range of typically-developing child outcomes including memory language skills, emotional understanding and understanding of mind. A recently published 9- year follow-up study further indicates that these benefits are longstanding. This has prompted speculation that ER could be a beneficial intervention for children with neurodevelopmental disorders who have known difficulties in these areas. To date, no studies have assessed the benefits of using ER as an intervention for ASD.

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of training parents to use ER as an intervention for high-functioning children with ASD. This study will use a two-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled design to compare a parent-delivered ER intervention against a control intervention (present tense talk).

Fifty parent-child dyads (comprising children with ASD and IQ \>70) will be recruited from mainstream schools, specialist unit/ schools, or relevant organisations (25 dyads per trial arm). Primary outcomes will be NIHR-recognised quantitative indicators of feasibility and acceptability for the ER condition.This will include (yet is not limited to) exploring the feasibility of methods of recruiting participants, feasibility of administering outcome assessments at baseline and follow-up, feasibility of delivering the training for ER and PTT remotely (i.e. through video conferencing), the feasibility of parents delivering ER or PTT in their home setting, and the acceptability of ER to parents. Parent acceptability of ER will be assessed using a daily logbook questionnaire and post-trial interviews, based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

Secondary outcomes will be measures of clinical and functional outcomes for both experimental conditions. Descriptive measures of general intelligence, vocabulary and developmental level will be administered at baseline for both experimental conditions (ER and PTT) and used to describe the participant sample. Outcome measures for child memory, mental state understanding, and self-concept will be administered at baseline and again after 20 weeks to assess change or response to the interventions. Differences in parent reminiscing style from baseline to post-trial will be assessed for all participants to assess the success of intervention training.

On completion of follow-up outcome assessments, parents in the ER condition will be invited to participate in a single qualitative interview to evaluate the acceptability of the ER intervention and study procedures. Interviews will be based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and the Necessity-Concerns Framework.

Descriptive statistics will be taken for indicators of intervention feasibility and acceptability.Comparisons between the two trial arms will be made using inferential statistical analysis for multiple outcomes, whilst adjusting for covariates.

In response to the present Covid-19 situation, this study will take place remotely. All interaction with participants (recruitment and data collection and participant testing) will use video software (e.g. Zoom, AdobeConnect, MS Teams), or online surveys (e.g. Qualtrics). Data analysis will either take place in the Autism Research Unit laboratory, located at City University of London, or remotely via a secure network.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria

Caregivers and children:

  1. Must have access to a digital device capable of receiving video calls (e.g. smartphone, tablet or computer) and internet
  2. Must primarily speak in English, as assessed with a pre-screening survey question.

Children only:

  1. Aged 7-11 years
  2. Diagnostic status i) Documented clinical diagnosis of ASD provided by caregivers or schools (e.g. a diagnostic report), OR ii) Meeting cut off for autism on the Social Communication Questionnaire (i.e. Score above or equal to 15 on SCQ)
  3. Intelligence within the average range or above as measured by the Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices (ie minimum IQ within 2 SD below the mean).
  4. Developmental and linguistic levels within the average range as measured by the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales (VABS-3) and the British Picture Vocabulary Scale (BPVS).
Exclusion Criteria

Caregivers and children:

  1. Must not currently be receiving care or treatment for a mental or psychiatric condition 4) Must not be currently taking part in another research study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Elaborative Reminiscence (ER)Elaborative Reminiscence (ER)ER is a communication strategy used between a caregiver and child to support children's cognitive and emotional development. ER involves a caregiver and child jointly reminiscing about a past event that they personally experienced, to co-create a coherent narrative that describes the event from both their perspectives. ER consists of two crucial elements, the use of elaborative language (e.g. open ended questions, contributing new information to the conversation) and specific talk focused on recollections of the past as opposed to observations of the present.
Present Tense Talk (PTT)Present Tense Talk (PTT)PTT is an active control intervention, designed to ensure that caregivers/ guardians in this group spend a similar amount of time engaging in conversation with their children but do not use elaborative reminiscing language. The focus will be on describing activities as they are happening in real time; PTT caregivers will be asked to avoid reference future or past events .
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Feasibility of training proceduresBaseline

Percentage of participants who demonstrate 70% or more of intervention behaviours during the training roleplay assessment.

Training enactmentChange from baseline to 20 weeks post-trial

Change to caregiver reminiscing style ratio following training

Intervention acceptability20 weeks post-trial

A qualitative analysis (guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability) of post-trial caregiver interviews to determine caregiver acceptability of the ER intervention.

Implementation fidelity (actual dosage)20 weeks post-trial

The actual number of intervention behaviours caregivers demonstrate during conversations at post-trial.

Trial recruitment feasibility20 weeks post-trial

The number of participants who dropped out of the trial as a percentage of the total number recruited.

Implementation fidelity (frequency of intervention delivery)20 weeks post-trial

The mean number of intervention minutes delivered by caregivers

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mental state understandingChange from baseline to 20 weeks post-trial

Change to child scores on the Theory of Mind Battery

Self-conceptChange from baseline to 20 weeks post-trial

Change to child scores on the Self-Description Questionnaire

Memory testChange from baseline to 20 weeks post-trial

Change to child scores on the California Verbal Learning Test for Children (CVLT-C)

Memory elaborationsChange from baseline to 20 weeks post-trial

Number of child memory elaborations during parent-child conversations

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

City University of London

🇬🇧

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath