MedPath

APPI-Cost Trial for Perforated Appendicitis

Phase 4
Recruiting
Conditions
Perforated Appendicitis
Interventions
Drug: PVI
Drug: Usual Care
Registration Number
NCT06705842
Lead Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of povidone-iodine (PVI) irrigation in perforated appendicitis, to investigate barriers and facilitators to future implementation of PVI irrigation, and to collect costs and clinical and patient-reported outcomes among patients with non-perforated appendicitis.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
346
Inclusion Criteria
  • Plan to undergo appendectomy for acute appendicitis
Exclusion Criteria
  • Preoperative hemodynamic instability requiring ongoing infusion of vasopressors
  • Allergy to iodine
  • Uncontrolled hyper- or hypothyroidism
  • Renal dysfunction
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Primary language neither English nor Spanish
  • Lack of functioning telephone or email account
  • Incarcerated or in police custody

Eligibility for Randomization

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in study preoperatively
  • Intraoperative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-perforated appendicitis

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PVIPVI-
Usual CareUsual Care-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cost-effectiveness of PVI relative to usual care90 day follow up

Cost-effectiveness of PVI irrigation relative to usual care will be assessed as the incremental 90-day total societal costs per percent reduction in IAA rate. The Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) will be calculated as: (societal costs with PVI irrigation minus societal costs with usual care) divided by (IAA rate with PVI minus IAA rate with usual care). IAA will be defined as an image-confirmed fluid collection deemed to be an IAA by an attending surgeon or radiologist, or an abscess confirmed during percutaneous intervention or reoperation. Societal costs will be defined as patient-reported costs plus medical costs for inpatient and outpatient care within 90 days from randomization. PVI will be deemed cost-effective by either 1) reducing 90-day IAA rate without increasing 90-day total societal costs, 2) reducing 90-day total societal costs without increasing 90-day IAA rate, or 3) reducing both 90-day societal costs and IAA rate.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total patient-reported costs30 days, 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months

Patient-reported costs will be assessed using a patient survey, which will be verbally administered by research personnel at each time point specified.

Health-related quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire30 days, 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months

This is a 6 item questionnaire and the first 5 questions are each scored from 1 (no problem) - 5 (unable to), for a maximum score of 25, with a higher number indicating a worse outcome. The 6th question is scored on a Likert scale from 0 (worst health you can imagine) - 100 (best health you can imagine), with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

Index admission total hospital costsIndex admission (variable duration)
90-day total hospital costs90 day follow up
Index admission total length of hospital stayIndex admission (variable duration)
90-day total length of hospital stay90 day follow up
Number of days of work missed by participant12 months
Postoperative complications90 days follow up

Complications include IAA, clinically relevant IAA, superficial/deep surgical site infection, ED visit, readmission, reoperation, subsequent procedure, or mortality

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath