APPI-Cost Trial for Perforated Appendicitis
- Conditions
- Perforated Appendicitis
- Interventions
- Drug: PVIDrug: Usual Care
- Registration Number
- NCT06705842
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of povidone-iodine (PVI) irrigation in perforated appendicitis, to investigate barriers and facilitators to future implementation of PVI irrigation, and to collect costs and clinical and patient-reported outcomes among patients with non-perforated appendicitis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 346
- Plan to undergo appendectomy for acute appendicitis
- Preoperative hemodynamic instability requiring ongoing infusion of vasopressors
- Allergy to iodine
- Uncontrolled hyper- or hypothyroidism
- Renal dysfunction
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Primary language neither English nor Spanish
- Lack of functioning telephone or email account
- Incarcerated or in police custody
Eligibility for Randomization
Inclusion Criteria:
- Enrolled in study preoperatively
- Intraoperative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-perforated appendicitis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description PVI PVI - Usual Care Usual Care -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cost-effectiveness of PVI relative to usual care 90 day follow up Cost-effectiveness of PVI irrigation relative to usual care will be assessed as the incremental 90-day total societal costs per percent reduction in IAA rate. The Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) will be calculated as: (societal costs with PVI irrigation minus societal costs with usual care) divided by (IAA rate with PVI minus IAA rate with usual care). IAA will be defined as an image-confirmed fluid collection deemed to be an IAA by an attending surgeon or radiologist, or an abscess confirmed during percutaneous intervention or reoperation. Societal costs will be defined as patient-reported costs plus medical costs for inpatient and outpatient care within 90 days from randomization. PVI will be deemed cost-effective by either 1) reducing 90-day IAA rate without increasing 90-day total societal costs, 2) reducing 90-day total societal costs without increasing 90-day IAA rate, or 3) reducing both 90-day societal costs and IAA rate.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total patient-reported costs 30 days, 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months Patient-reported costs will be assessed using a patient survey, which will be verbally administered by research personnel at each time point specified.
Health-related quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire 30 days, 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months This is a 6 item questionnaire and the first 5 questions are each scored from 1 (no problem) - 5 (unable to), for a maximum score of 25, with a higher number indicating a worse outcome. The 6th question is scored on a Likert scale from 0 (worst health you can imagine) - 100 (best health you can imagine), with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.
Index admission total hospital costs Index admission (variable duration) 90-day total hospital costs 90 day follow up Index admission total length of hospital stay Index admission (variable duration) 90-day total length of hospital stay 90 day follow up Number of days of work missed by participant 12 months Postoperative complications 90 days follow up Complications include IAA, clinically relevant IAA, superficial/deep surgical site infection, ED visit, readmission, reoperation, subsequent procedure, or mortality
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States