跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03606278
NCT03606278已完成不适用

Evaluation of Two Strategies for Constructive Immediate Feedback in the Development of Skills for Neonatal Resuscitation: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Universidad de la Sabana0 个研究点目标入组 24 人开始时间: 2016年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
24
主要终点
Compliance percentage of the activities

研究概览

简要总结

Introduction: Training of health professionals in neonatal resuscitation reduces risks and adverse events during this intervention. Simulation-based education with constructive immediate feedback (debriefing) is an effective teaching method for personnel in charge of neonatal resuscitation.

Objective: To evaluate two debriefing strategies for the development of neonatal resuscitation skills in professionals specialized in critical newborn care.

Materials and Methods: A simple blind randomized clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-four professionals (pediatricians, nurses, and respiratory therapists) were randomly assigned for two interventions; one group received oral debriefing and the other oral debriefing assisted by video. Three standardized clinical scenarios that were recorded on video were executed. A checklist was applied for the evaluation, administered by a reviewer blinded to the assignment of the type of debriefing.

Null hypothesis: The improved in the skills of neonatal resuscitation is the same for both strategies of debriefing.

Alternative hypothesis: The improved in the skills of neonatal resuscitation is different for both strategies of debriefing

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

For the performance and evaluation score of the adherence of the teams to the resuscitation protocols, a review of the literature was performed, and the modified version of the validated Neonatal Resuscitation Performance Evaluation (NRPE) tool was considered (1). Given that this instrument did not consider behavioral and leadership aspects, a checklist of individual performance and performance by profession was constructed in each of the scenarios that included cognitive/technical and behavioral aspects. This checklist was applied by a reviewer blinded to the assignment of the type of debriefing by reviewing the video of the participation of the groups in the scenarios.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •The specialized health professionals (Professional nurses, respiratory therapists, and pediatricians) in charge of newborn care that working in the Neonatal Unit areas, maternity wards, surgery rooms responsible for the care of caesarean sections, and those of pediatric emergencies of University Hospital of La Sabana

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Structured debriefing assisted by video

Experimental

In the structured debriefing assisted by video, the process was based on the immediate review of the video, stopping and rewinding the recording as required.

干预措施: Structured debriefing assisted by video (Other)

Structured oral debriefing

Active Comparator

In the structured oral debriefing, the process was based by the mental search of their memories of what occurred.

干预措施: Structured oral debriefing (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Compliance percentage of the activities

时间窗: The checklist was applied by a reviewer blinded to the assignment of the type of debriefing by reviewing the video, on average 1 week after of the participation of the groups in the scenarios.

For the performance and evaluation score of the adherence of the teams to the resuscitation protocols, a review of the literature was performed for constructed a checklist that included cognitive/technical and behavioral aspects of individual performance and performance by profession in each of the scenarios. Each item of the tool was assigned a score of 1 if the evaluated activity was correctly performed, 0 if it was not performed correctly, and N/A if it did not apply for the scenario and/or for the profession. A compliance percentage (range 0% to 100%) of the activities evaluated by participant in the tool was obtained, summed the points obtained onto the possible total score. The higher percentage indicate better outcome.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验