跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06930131
NCT06930131招募中不适用

Effect of Anomia Rehabilitation Combined With Metacognitive Training in Patients With Chronic Vascular Aphasia

University Hospital, Toulouse1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 18 人开始时间: 2025年2月21日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
18
试验地点
1
主要终点
Performance at the "TD-264" untrained naming items task

研究概览

简要总结

The postulate of this study is that rehabilitation combining linguistic and metacognitive training will result in a significant improvement in language performance correlated with changes in functional cerebral connectivity networks. In addition, it could potentiate the generalisation of effects to verbal and non-verbal communication skills, having a direct impact on patients' quality of life. This research is a prospective, randomized controlled, open-label, single-centre study. It is part of the management of patients with aphasia who have suffered a cerebral infarction and aims to evaluate the effect of combined language semantics/metacognition rehabilitation.

详细描述

Vascular aphasia occurs after 20 to 25% of strokes and leads to anomia or word-finding difficulties in many patients. Speech therapy, which is the standard treatment, notably employs Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA). SFA aims to teach patients a strategy that helps activate semantic links strongly associated with the target word, thereby facilitating word retrieval.

Moreover, a growing number of studies suggest combining metacognitive strategy training with language rehabilitation in brain-injured patients, particularly in reading comprehension, communication skills, and anomia, could improve cognitive and language recovery outcomes. In rehabilitation, metacognitive strategy training can be used to enhance and/or compensate for cognitive function deficits. Patients are repeatedly exposed to discrepancies between the patients performance evaluations and expectations. Findings indicate improvements in trained tasks and transfer effects to similar tasks.

While studies have examined the effects of linguistic training on one hand and the impact of metacognitive abilities on the other, to the investigators knowledge, no study has assessed the effect of a combined linguistic and metacognitive training approach in post-stroke aphasic patients on behavioral and imaging variables. This study postulates that rehabilitation combining linguistic and metacognitive training will lead to a significant improvement in language performance, correlated with changes in functional brain connectivity networks. Furthermore, it may enhance the generalization of effects to both verbal and non-verbal communication skills, directly impacting patients' quality of life.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • First cerebral infarction
  • Chronic phase (> 3 months)
  • Patient affiliated to a health insurance scheme
  • Usual french language
  • Severity score measures using the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination battery scale corresponding to the mild or moderate level (score greater than or equal to 2)

排除标准

  • Contraindication to undergoing brain MRI
  • Cognitive impairment pre-existing stroke (CQI code > 3.4) (Law et al., 1995)
  • Chronic alcohol or drug abuse
  • Unstabilised psychiatric illness
  • Uncorrected sensory deficits
  • Diagnosed as having a progressive general pathology

研究组 & 干预措施

6 weeks phase A (Baseline)

Other

干预措施: Semantic rehabilitation (Behavioral)

7 weeks phase A (Baseline)

Other

干预措施: Semantic rehabilitation (Behavioral)

8 weeks phase A (Baseline)

Other

干预措施: Semantic rehabilitation (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Performance at the "TD-264" untrained naming items task

时间窗: Baseline, Up to 8 weeks, Up to 13 weeks

The "TD-264 untrained naming items task" is a naming task of 264 images. Words corresponding to the images correctly named are "set success" and words wrongly named are "set treatment". The score at the task is composite : * reaction time allowing the speed of evocation to be measured will be measured with the Audacity software (https://audacity.fr/). * accuracy will be rated 1. quantitatively : number of "set success" 2. qualitatively : description of naming behaviors Scores are all from 0 to 264. 0 being the worst performance possible and 264 being the best performance possible.

次要结局

  • Reorganization of patients' functional connectivity maps compared to healthy volunteers(Up to 8 weeks ; Up to 13 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验