MedPath

Cone Beam CT for Diagnosis of Select Otorhinolaryngology (ENT) Indications at Lower Dose

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
CerebroSpinal Fluid (CSF) Leak
Otosclerosis
Chronic Otitis Media
Pulsatile Tinnitus
Otospongiosis
Cholesteatoma
Interventions
Radiation: Radiation
Registration Number
NCT01855425
Lead Sponsor
Carestream Health, Inc.
Brief Summary

The study objective is to compare the CBCT images generated by the CS 9300 to those generated by conventional CT.

Detailed Description

The study objective is to compare the CBCT images generated by the CS 9300 to those generated by conventional CT. It proposes a direct comparison of diagnostic image quality between the CS 9300 and CT for the ability to view and confirm ENT disorders.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
96
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subject must be 18-80 years of age
  • Subjects has provided informed consent
  • Subjects must present with symptoms and/or pathology of the sinus or temporal bone region.
  • Subject scheduled for additional radiological follow-up and/or endoscopy/surgery.
  • CBCT exam performed within a maximum of 2 days of the conventional CT.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subjects under the age of 18 years, or over the age of 80 years
  • Unable to collect all required case information
  • Subjects not willing to consent, or consent is withdrawn
  • Women in pregnancy or suspected of being pregnant confirmed by pregnancy test

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Investigational CBCTRadiationRadiation
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants With >=3 Diagnostic Rating Using Radlex Scale11 months

Percentage of Participants with \>=3 Diagnostic Rating Using Radlex Scale. Five radiologists participated in reader study using Radlex scale below to analyze and rate participant images. They determined if they could make a medical diagnosis for ENT patients.

Used Radlex Scale - 1-Non-diagnostic, Unacceptable for diagnostic purposes. 2-Limited Acceptable, with some technical defect. 3-Diagnostic, Image quality that would be expected routinely when imaging cooperative patients. 4-Exemplary, Good most adequate for diagnostic purposes.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Johns Hopkins Medical Center

🇺🇸

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

C.H.U Bicetre

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Sint-Augustinus Hospital

🇧🇪

Antwerp, Belgium

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath