Evaluation of Medical Literacy in Patients Who Presented With a TIA Treated in Emergency Departments in Lyon
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Quality of responses to the medical literacy questionnaire specific to TIAs
研究概览
简要总结
There are around 30,000 TIAs (transient ischemic attacks) per year in France. This pathology can be the warning sign of a stroke, responsible for significant morbidity and mortality at the population level.
An important part of patient care is to teach them to recognize the symptoms suggestive of a stroke as well as the contributing factors, thus improving the medical literacy of patients.
The results of studies that have assessed medical literacy in France and Europe converge towards a rather low level.
Some studies have focused on stroke literacy in France. They show good knowledge of risk factors and the attitude to adopt in the event of a stroke, but recognition of symptoms remains problematic.
There is very little literature concerning knowledge of TIA in the general population and there are no studies concerning literacy in a population having presented with TIA.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the knowledge of patients who have presented with a TIA (and therefore at high cardiovascular risk) about this disease (risk factors, symptoms, severity, attitude to adopt in the event of symptoms), after their visit to the emergency room.
The investigators make the hypothesis that knowledge of TIA and its consequences will be rather low in this population of patient, even after a medical contact at the emergency room.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Quality of responses to the medical literacy questionnaire specific to TIAs
时间窗: Day 1 at inclusion
The questionnaire contains 18 questions, open or closed. Each question will be analysed separately and the results will be expressed as a percentage of correct answer (in the case of a closed question mainly) or by specifying the different answers provided by the patients (in the case of an open question mainly)
次要结局
未报告次要终点
