Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01463657
NCT01463657
Completed
Phase 1

A Phase 2 Bilateral (Split-face) Comparison Study to Assess Two Formulations of ELAPR Compared to Juvéderm® Ultra Plus for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds

Elastagen Pty Ltd2 sites in 1 country30 target enrollmentNovember 2011
ConditionsAging

Overview

Phase
Phase 1
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Aging
Sponsor
Elastagen Pty Ltd
Enrollment
30
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Assess the effect of two formulations of ELAPR on change from baseline of the severity of the Nasolabial folds against a Wrinkle Assessment Scale of Nasolabial folds score at 24 weeks vs. active control
Status
Completed
Last Updated
13 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Patients presenting to the clinic for treatment of moderate to severe Nasolabial folds will be recruited to receive either ELAPR002b or ELAPR002d for the treatment of one Nasolabial fold and Juvéderm® Ultra Plus for the treatment of the second, opposite Nasolabial fold.

Detailed Description

The treatment will be repeated on Day 29 (if required) and Day 57 (if required) to achieve optimum cosmetic results (OCR). Each treatment will consist of up to 15 injections in total, each consisting of up to 0.1 ml of product, delivered to the mid to deep dermis of the skin of each Nasolabial fold using a 27G needle. Each patient will receive the same preparation implanted as a bolus of 0.1mL at Day 1 into the mid-deep dermis of the skin of the medial aspect of the upper arm using a 27G needle, and two 2mm biopsies will be taken at the same visit on Day 57, Day 85 or Day 169 depending on randomisation for histopathology assessment.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 2011
End Date
December 2012
Last Updated
13 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Aged 25 - 65 years
  • Male or Female
  • Moderate to severe NLFs scored equally as a 3 or 4 out of 5 on both sides of the face using the WAS scale
  • Good general health status
  • Able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Clinically significant abnormalities of haematology or biochemistry testing
  • Bleeding diathesis, anticoagulant drugs, thrombocytopenia or clinically significant prolonged bleeding time
  • Chronic use of aspirin, other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or other anti-platelet agents
  • Allergy to local anaesthetics
  • Active infection at the treatment site
  • Treatment of either NLF other than with a hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal filler and treatment with a HA dermal filler within 18 months of enrolment
  • Any serious medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator would have a strong possibility of requiring systemic corticosteroid medication
  • Pregnancy/lactation
  • History of keloid formation
  • Systemic corticosteroids within last 12 weeks

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Assess the effect of two formulations of ELAPR on change from baseline of the severity of the Nasolabial folds against a Wrinkle Assessment Scale of Nasolabial folds score at 24 weeks vs. active control

Time Frame: 24 weeks

The primary efficacy variable is the change in Wrinkle Assessment Scale (WAS). The values for WAS recorded at each visit will be summarized by treatment.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Assess the acute safety of ELAPR(24 weeks)
  • Assess chronic safety of ELAPR(24 weeks)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials