跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04708366
NCT04708366Unknown4 期

Colon Cleansing Efficacy With 1L PEG Versus 2L PEG and 4L PEG for Colonoscopy Among Inpatients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

University of Bologna1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 846 人开始时间: 2021年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
发起方
入组人数
846
试验地点
1
主要终点
Proportion of patients with adequate colon cleansing

研究概览

简要总结

An adequate level of bowel preparation before colonoscopy has an extremely relevant impact on lesion detection and procedure success. The inpatient status represents a well-known independent predictor for inadequate colon cleansing. A recent prospective, multicentre, Italian study among inpatients showed that an adequate colon cleansing was achieved in 60-70% of patients, far below the ideal threshold of 90%. Interestingly, a higher rate of adequate colon cleansing was reported for a very low-volume (1L) polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based preparation when compared to 4L and 2L PEG-based solutions. However, this finding has to be confirmed as the study was not controlled and the PEG-1L group was much smaller than the other two.

Aim of the present multicenter randomized controlled study will be to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of a novel very-low volume (1L) PEG-based preparation vs. standard-of-care low-volume (2L) and high-volume (4L) PEG-based purge, among inpatients who undergo colonoscopy.

详细描述

An adequate level of bowel preparation before colonoscopy has an extremely relevant impact on lesion detection and procedure success. The inpatient status represents a well-known independent predictor for inadequate colon cleansing. A recent prospective, multicentre, Italian study among inpatients showed that an adequate colon cleansing was achieved in 60-70% of patients, far below the ideal threshold of 90%. Such a low efficacy has several negative consequences: first, it leads to repetition of colonoscopy, therefore prolonging patients' in-hospital stay and increasing the risk of adverse events and costs; second, it augments the risk of missing colorectal lesions, negatively affecting patients' management and increasing costs due to the need for adjunctive diagnostic studies.

Current recommendations on bowel preparation among difficult-to-prepare patients are mostly based on expert opinions, the high-volume 4L polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based prep being considered as the gold standard, possibly with further additional solution. On the other hand, compliance to the bowel preparation has been related to an adequate colon cleansing, and it may be argued that inpatients might find it difficult to take high-volume purge. A recent Italian prospective multicentre study among inpatients showed similar rates of adequate bowel preparation between patients who underwent bowel preparation with and without additional solution. Interestingly, a higher rate of adequate colon cleansing was reported for a very low-volume (1L) polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based preparation when compared to 4L and 2L PEG-based solutions. However, this finding has to be confirmed as the study was not controlled and the PEG-1L group was much smaller than the other two.

Aim of the present randomized multicenter controlled study will be to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of a novel very-low volume (1L) PEG-based preparation vs. standard-of-care low-volume (2L) and high-volume (4L) PEG-based purge, among inpatients.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Inpatients scheduled for elective colonoscopy
  • bowel preparation performed inside the hospital
  • ≥18 years old

排除标准

  • known or suspected ileus
  • gastrointestinal obstruction
  • gastric retention
  • bowel perforation
  • toxic colitis, or megacolon
  • phenylketonuria
  • glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
  • active intestinal bleeding
  • emergency colonoscopy
  • dementia or illness requiring nasogastric tube for bowel prep administration
  • refusal to participate or inability to sign the informed consent

研究组 & 干预措施

1L PEG

Experimental

Patients will be prepared with 1L-PEG-based bowel preparation.

干预措施: NER1006 (Drug)

2L PEG

Active Comparator

Patients will be prepared with 2L-PEG-based bowel preparation.

干预措施: MoviPrep (Drug)

4L PEG

Active Comparator

Patients will be prepared with 4L-PEG-based bowel preparation.

干预措施: Macrogol 400 (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Proportion of patients with adequate colon cleansing

时间窗: During the procedure.

Efficacy will be assessed as the percentage of patients with adequate bowel cleansing, as rated according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). This scale gives 0-3 points to each of the three colonic segments (i.e. right colon, transverse colon, and left colon); 0 points are assigned for the worst segment cleansing, whereas at least 2 points stand for adequate segment cleansing. Adequate colon cleansing is defined when at least 2 points are reached in each colonic segment.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
University of Bologna
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Lorenzo Fuccio

Professor of Gastroenterology

University of Bologna

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验