MedPath

Evaluating the Cost-effectiveness, Efficacy, Safety and Tolerance of Mepilex® Ag Versus Silvadene®

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Second Degree Burn
Registration Number
NCT00742183
Lead Sponsor
Molnlycke Health Care AB
Brief Summary

The primary objective is to compare the incremental costs (direct and indirect) and benefits (healing outcomes, quality of life) of using foam silver dressing (Mepilex® Ag) to a Silver sulfadiazine 1% cream (Silvadene®) from the perspective of the health care provider.

The secondary objectives are to investigate the safety, the tolerance and the performance on burn status including pain.

Detailed Description

In- and/or out-patients at ten centers in the United States were included in this investigation. Subjects included were 5 years of age and older who suffered from partial thickness burns. Every patient was followed for 3 weeks.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with a second degree burn covering 5% to 20% BSA. TBSA covered with burn is allowed to be up to 25%, allowing a maximum of 10% to be third degree burn (only the Second degree burn should be treated)
  • Burn of thermal origin
  • Both gender with an age ≥ 5 years at randomization
  • Signed informed consent
  • Subjects who are younger than the legal consenting age must have a legally authorized representative
Exclusion Criteria
    • Burns equal to or older than 36 hours
  • Burns of chemical and electrical origin
  • Clinically infected Burn (as judged by the investigator)
  • Treatment of the burn with an active agent before study entry, SSD is allowed up to 24 hours prior to randomization
  • Patients with necrotising leucocytic vasculitis or pyoderma gangrenosa.
  • Diagnosed underlying disease(s) (e.g. HIV/AIDS, cancer and severe anaemia) judged by the investigator to be a potential interference in the treatment.
  • Patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
  • Patients treated with systemic glucocorticosteroids, except patients taking occasional doses or doses less than 10mg prednisolon/day or equivalent.
  • Use of immunosuppressive agents, radiation or chemotherapy within the past 30 days.
  • Known allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the components of the investigation products.
  • Patients with physical and/or mental conditions that are not expected to comply with the investigation.
  • Participation in other clinical investigation(s) within 1 month prior to start of the investigation
  • Pregnancy
  • Previously randomised to this investigation

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Compare the Costs of Using the Interventions (Direct and Indirect)August 2008-August 2009

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is calculated as the difference in total costs in each group divided by the difference in rate of full re-epithelialization (taken from the survival curve) at 20 days in each group (Δcosts/ Δeffects). Total costs were calculated based on the costs of primary and secondary dressings, silver sulphadiazine cream and estimated application, labor, supplies and pain medications. These costs were estimated from a representative sample of each population, across study facilities, using activity-based costing methods.

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is interpreted as the price of additional health benefits. The ratio is supposed to be used by decision makers, in order for them to compare their willingness-to-pay for an additional health benefit with the pr

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (10)

LA County Hospital & USC Medical Center

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

The Burn Center, Washington Hospital Center

🇺🇸

Washington, District of Columbia, United States

Shands Burn Center, University of Florida

🇺🇸

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Joseph Still Burn Center

🇺🇸

Augusta, Georgia, United States

UI Burn Treatment center

🇺🇸

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Cornell Medical Center

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

Paul Silverstein Burn center

🇺🇸

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

St Christopher's Hospital

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Southwestern Regional Burn Center, Parkland Hospital

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

Department of Surgery

🇺🇸

Seattle, Washington, United States

LA County Hospital & USC Medical Center
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.