跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01755923
NCT01755923Unknown2 期

A Phase Ⅱ Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Gefitinib With Docetaxel as Second-line Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Non-squamous NSCLC Patients With Wild-type EGFR

Peking Union Medical College Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2012年12月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
2 期
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
Progression free survival

研究概览

简要总结

Gefitinib, the first EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in the world was examined as monotherapy in two phase Ⅱ studies called IDEAL trials. Response rate with doses of 250mg and 500mg/day were similar, ranging from 10% to 18%. Posterior analysis demonstrated that patients with EGFR mutation had an improved response rate (RR) to gefitinib compared to wild-type patients (46% versus 10%). The early trials that evaluated EGFR-TKIs for the second- and third-line settings of advanced NSCLC did not select patients on the basis of any EGFR marker. The IEESSA Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer (ISEL) trial evaluated the role of second-line gefitinib 250mg/day in 1692 patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients with EGFR mutations had higher RR than patients without (37.5% versus 2.6%). From the above results, the response rate in patients without EGFR gene mutation was obviously different (10% versus 2.6%). The methods used for detecting EGFR gene mutation was different, which might contribute to the difference of response rates. In IDEAL trial, EGFR gene mutation was detected by sequencing. But in ISEL trial, EGFR gene mutation was detected by ARMS. As we know, ARMS was more sensitive than sequencing in detecting EGFR gene mutation. That is to say, in IDEAL trials some EGFR mutant patients were misdiagnosed as wild-type patients, so the response rate was higher. Recently, Wu Yi-Long et al reported that relative abundance of EGFR mutations predicted benefit form gefitinib treatment for advanced non small cell lung cancer. The study cohort was all Chinese. In this study, the objective response rate in patients without EGFR mutation detected by ARMS was 16.1%, which was significantly higher than the response rate of docetaxel. But in 2012 American society of clinical oncology (ASCO) annual meeting, the Tailor study in which Italian NSCLC patients were enrolled demonstrated a clear superiority of docetaxel over erlotinib as second line treatment for patients without EGFR mutations in exons 19 or 21. So we wonder if the racial difference is the determinant factor. So the purpose of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of gefitinib with docetaxel as second-line therapy for advanced or metastatic Chinese NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR.

详细描述

The adoption of docetaxel as a standard second line therapy was based on data from two phase Ⅲ trials. In the first trail, docetaxel (75mg/m2, every 3 weeks) significantly prolonged median and 1-year survival duration compared with best supportive care (median survival, 7.5 months versus 4.6 months; P=0.010; 1-year survival, 37% versus 12%), although the response rate was low (5.5%). In the second study the 6-months and median survival rates were similar for docetaxel and vinorelbine or ifosfamide. However, the 1-year survival rate was significantly greater with docetaxel than ifosfamide or vinorelbine (32% versus 19%, P=0.025). In both studies docetaxel significantly improved some parameters of quality of life. Since these two pivotal studies, new potential second-line drugs were compared with the docetaxel standard of care. With regards to the therapeutic results of the docetaxel arm of these studies, it must be emphasized that response rates and survival data were highly and significantly reproducible.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age more than 18 years old
  • Life expectancy more than 12 weeks
  • histologically or cytologically confirmed inoperable non-squamous NSCLC (stage ⅢB/Ⅳ)
  • ineligible for curative radiotherapy
  • no prior radiotherapy for the target lesions
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0-2
  • previous treatment include first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy
  • no EGFR gene mutation detected by Scorpions-ARMS
  • at least one bidimensionally measurable or radiographically assessable lesion
  • adequate bone marrow reserve
  • adequate hepatic and renal function

排除标准

  • prior treatments including any of the following drugs: gefitinib and docetaxel
  • additional malignancies
  • uncontrolled systemic disease
  • any evidence of clinically active interstitial lung disease
  • newly diagnosed central nervous system (CNS)metastasis and not treated by radiotherapy of surgery
  • pregnancy or breast feeding phase

研究组 & 干预措施

Gefitinib

Experimental

Gefitinib (Iressa) 250mg once per day until progression disease or intolerant side effects

干预措施: Gefitinib (Drug)

Docetaxel

Active Comparator

Docetaxel 75mg/m2,d1,every 3 weeks, at least 2-6 cycles depending on the progression disease or the patient's physical condition

干预措施: Docetaxel (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Progression free survival

时间窗: up to 52 weeks (about one year)

From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 52 weeks.

次要结局

  • Overall survival(Up to 100 weeks)
  • Objective response rate(up to 9 weeks)
  • the score of functional assessment of cancer treatment-lung (FACT-L)(up to 100 weeks)
  • Number of participants with adverse events(Up to 6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Gefitinib or Docetaxel as Second Line Therapy for... | 临床试验