MedPath

Low-level Light Therapy for Overactive Bladder and Urinary Incontinence

Phase 3
Conditions
Overactive Bladder
Urinary Incontinence
Interventions
Device: Low-level light therapy
Device: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT02980328
Lead Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a self-therapeutic approach of skin adhesive low-level light therapy (LLLT) in females with Overactive Bladder (OAB) and Urinary Incontinence (UI)

Detailed Description

Study design: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centered trial carried out at two university hospitals. This clinical trial was approved by the Korea Food and Drug Administration and the Institutional Review Boards of the two hospitals.

Study process:

All patients gave informed written consent after being informed of the details of the study. Participants were randomized into either the LLLT or placebo control groups at the third visit. All participants underwent demographic and history taking, a physical examination, bladder examination and laboratory tests. All participants were educated on how to use the device by demonstration and a picture-guided user manual.

During the second visit, the participants conducted a self-evaluation of frequency of urgency urinary incontinence episode using the OABSS scale and underwent urine examination (pre-treatment measurement). The third visit occurred 7 days from the date of the second visit, and a clinical primary nurse described how to use the medical equipment and devices when they were at home. All subjects filled out self-reported diary and filled out UDI-6 and IIQ-7 questionnaires in each visit. Subjects carried out the self-treatment in the same way at home 3 times a day for 12 weeks and then visited the hospital at week 4 and 12 to undergo examination and filled out OABSS, UDI-6 and IIQ-7 questionnaires (post-treatment measurement).

Statistical analysis:

All data are summarized as means ± standard deviation or as numbers with proportions. A p \< 0.05 was considered to indicate significance. The investigator decided that the therapeutic effect would be a \> 20% reduction in the frequency of urgency urinary incontinence episodes after treatment. The statistical analysis was conducted using the self-reported micturition diary after the 12 week visit as the primary endpoint. The investigator used an independent t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test depending on the normality of the data to evaluate differences in each group between frequency of urgency urinary incontinence episodes measured after the 12 week visit and baseline values. To test for normality, the investigator performed Shapiro-Wilk's test. The examination of the ratio difference in nominal variable was carried out using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A per-protocol (PP) and intent to treat (ITT) analyses were used in our clinical trial to assess efficacy and safety. A Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used for ITT analysis missing data.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • Clinical diagnosis of overactive bladder or urinary incontinence
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of taking medication for urgency urinary incontinence,

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
LLLT groupLow-level light therapyLow-level light therapy (LLLT) was self-performed for 12 weeks, 3 times a day for 20 minutes each
Placebo-controlled groupPlaceboPlacebo low-level light therapy (LLLT) was self-performed for 12 weeks, 3 times a day for 20 minutes each. The placebo LLLT device was identical to the active device but did not radiate light as the hole was blocked.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Frequency of urinary incontinence episodewithin 12 weeks after treatment

The primary outcome was frequency of urgency urinary incontinence episode based on the self-evaluated micturition diary measuring the difference between urgency urinary incontinence episode count pre and post-treatment. Urgency urinary incontinence episode was measured by the mean of 3 days report prior to the visit (week 0, 4 and 12). The higher values represent a worse outcome. All data collected by self-reported sheet. The participants conducted a self-evaluation of frequency of urgency urinary incontinence episode from 3 days prior to the visits and submitted to the investigator.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes in Quality of lifewithin 12 weeks after treatment

The secondary outcome measures was quality of life, assessed by UDI-6 and IIQ-7. The UDI-6 descriptive system comprises the following 6 dimensions: bladder stimulation (2), stress-related urinary incontinence (2), obstructive disorder and pain. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. The subscales combined to compute a total score according to UDI-6 equation formula. The higher values represent a worse outcome. The IIQ-7 descriptive system comprises the following 7 dimensions: physical activity (2), travelling (2), social activity and psychological effect (2). Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems, and the score was calculated by multiplying 33 to the score (maximum 100). The subscales combined to compute a total score according to IIQ-7 equation formula.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Seoul National Univesity Bundang Hospital

🇰🇷

Seongnam-si, Kyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of

Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath