A Study to Test the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Chinese Women With Osteoporosis
- Registration Number
- NCT05067335
- Lead Sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRL
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of treatment with romosozumab for 6 months compared with placebo on the percent changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, at the total hip and femoral neck in postmenopausal Chinese women with osteoporosis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 327
-
Subject is considered reliable and capable of adhering to the protocol, visit schedule, and medication intake according to the judgment of the investigator
-
Subject is an ambulatory postmenopausal Chinese women, 55 to 90 years of age (inclusive) at the time of Screening. Postmenopause is defined as no spontaneous vaginal bleeding or spotting for 12 or more consecutive months prior to Screening
-
Subject has a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score ≤-2.50 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of Screening based on DXA scans, and using data for Caucasian women from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES, 1998)
-
Subject must have at least 1 of following independent risk factors for fracture:
- History of fragility fracture (except hip fracture, a severe vertebral fracture or more than 2 moderate vertebral fractures)
- Parental history of hip fracture
- Low body weight (body mass index ≤19kg/m2)
- Elderly (age ≥ 65 years)
- Current smoker
-
Subject has at least 2 vertebrae in the L1 to L4 region and at least 1 hip that are evaluable by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), as assessed by the central imaging vendor
-
Subject has a BMD T-score of ≤-3.50 at the total hip or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of Screening based on DXA scans, and using data for Caucasian women from NHANES 1998
-
Subject has a known history of hip fracture
-
Subject has any severe (SQ3) or more than 2 moderate (SQ2) vertebral fractures, as assessed by the central imaging vendor based on the lateral spine x-ray at Screening
-
Subject has a history of myocardial infarction (MI)
-
Subject has a history of stroke
-
Subject has a vitamin D insufficiency, defined as 25 (OH) vitamin D levels <20 ng/mL, as assessed by the central laboratory at Screening. Vitamin D repletion will be permitted and the subject may be retested once within the Screening Period
-
Subject has used oral bisphosphonates:
- Any doses received within 3 months prior to randomization
- More than 1 month of cumulative use between 3 and 12 months prior to randomization
- More than 3 years of cumulative use, unless the last dose was received ≥5 years prior to randomization
-
Subject has used intravenous (iv) bisphosphonates:
-
zoledronic acid
- Any doses received within 3 years prior to randomization
- More than 1 dose received within 5 years prior to randomization
-
iv ibandronate, iv pamidronate, or iv alendronate (ALN)
- Any doses received within 12 months prior to randomization
- More than 3 years of cumulative use, unless the last dose was received ≥5 years prior to randomization
-
-
Subject has used denosumab or any cathepsin K inhibitor:
● Any doses received within 18 months prior to randomization
-
Subject has used tibolone, cinacalcet, or calcitonin:
- Any doses received within 3 months prior to randomization
-
Subject has used teriparatide (TPTD) or any parathyroid hormone (PTH) derivative:
- Any doses received within 3 months prior to randomization
- More than 1 month of cumulative use between 3 and 12 months prior to randomization
-
Subject has used systemic oral or transdermal estrogen or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs):
● More than 1 month of cumulative use within 6 months prior to randomization
-
Subject has used strontium ranelate or fluoride:
● More than 1 month of cumulative use within 5 years prior to randomization
-
Subject has used hormonal ablation therapy:
● More than 1 month of cumulative use within 6 months prior to randomization
-
Subject has used systemic glucocorticosteroids:
● ≥5mg prednisone equivalent per day for more than 14 days within 3 months prior to randomization
-
Subject has a history of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) or atypical femoral fracture (AFF)
-
Subject has evidence of any of the following:
- Current, uncontrolled hyper- or hypothyroidism. Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism is defined as thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroxine (T4) outside of the normal range. Uncontrolled hypothyroidism is defined as TSH >10
- Current, uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism or history of hypoparathyroidism. Uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism is defined as PTH outside the normal range in subjects with concurrent hypercalcemia or PTH values >20 % above upper limit of normal (ULN) in normocalcemic subjects
- Current hypercalcemia or hypocalcemia, defined as albumin-adjusted serum calcium outside the normal range, as assessed by the central laboratory at the time of Screening. Albumin-adjusted serum calcium levels may be retested once in case of an elevated albumin-adjusted serum calcium level within 1.1xULN of the laboratory's reference ranges
- Subject has ≥3xULN of any of the following: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), or >ULN total bilirubin (≥1.5xULN total bilirubin if known Gilbert's syndrome). If subject has elevations only in total bilirubin that are >ULN and <1.5xULN, fractionate bilirubin to identify possible undiagnosed Gilbert's syndrome (ie, direct bilirubin <35 %)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Placebo Placebo Subjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo during the Double-Blind-Placebo controlled Period and romosozumab during the Open-Label treatment Period Romosozumab Romosozumab Subjects randomized to this arm will receive romosozumab during all treatment Periods. Placebo Romosozumab Subjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo during the Double-Blind-Placebo controlled Period and romosozumab during the Open-Label treatment Period
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Lumbar Spine to the End of Double-Blind Period From Baseline (Day 1) to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6) Percent change from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at 6 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to ...
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Double-Blind Period From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6) An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a IMP, whether or ...
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events for Romosozumab During Overall Period From Month 7 up to Month 12 (Placebo/Romo) and From Day 1 up to Month 12 (Romo/Romo) + 3-month SFU (up to Month 15) An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a IMP, whether or not related to IMP. TEAE...
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Total Hip to the End of Double-Blind Period From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6) Percent change from baseline in BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at 6 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approa...
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck to the End of the Double-Blind Period From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6) Percent change from baseline in BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at 6 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random app...
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine at Month 12 Baseline, Month 12 Percent change from Baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine was assessed by DXA at 12 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random ap...
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Total Hip at Month 12 Baseline, Month 12 Percent change from Baseline in BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at 12 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random appro...
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck at Month 12 Baseline, Month 12 Percent change from Baseline in BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at 12 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random ap...
Trial Locations
- Locations (30)
Op0002 20199
🇨🇳Rui'an, China
Op0002 20130
🇨🇳Beijing, China
Op0002 20117
🇨🇳Guangzhou, China
Op0002 20124
🇨🇳Guangzhou, China
Op0002 20118
🇨🇳Shanghai, China
Op0002 20121
🇨🇳Shanghai, China
Op0002 20040
🇨🇳Beijing, China
Op0002 20115
🇨🇳Beijing, China
Op0002 20125
🇨🇳Beijing, China
Op0002 20127
🇨🇳Beijing, China
Op0002 20128
🇨🇳Beijing, China
Op0002 20021
🇨🇳Chengdu, China
Op0002 20131
🇨🇳Beijing, China
Op0002 20157
🇨🇳Beijing, China
Op0002 20133
🇨🇳Chengdu, China
Op0002 20137
🇨🇳Chengdu, China
Op0002 20205
🇨🇳Foshan, China
Op0002 20209
🇨🇳Nanchang, China
Op0002 20202
🇨🇳Pingxiang, China
Op0002 20116
🇨🇳Shanghai, China
Op0002 20129
🇨🇳Shanghai, China
Op0002 20123
🇨🇳Shanghai, China
Op0002 20119
🇨🇳Suzhou, China
Op0002 20204
🇨🇳Suzhou, China
Op0002 20122
🇨🇳Tianjin, China
Op0002 20136
🇨🇳Tianjin, China
Op0002 20120
🇨🇳Wuhan, China
Op0002 20134
🇨🇳Yueyang, China
Op0002 20132
🇨🇳Zhengzhou, China
Op0002 20135
🇨🇳Nanjing, China